this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
270 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46426 readers
2293 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, do we get to start calling what's happening everywhere world war 3 or is there like some committee that meets on this?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Once some major players start conscripting people I think it'd be reasonable to call it WW3. This is the preamble

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn't russia been conscripting for a couple of years now?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

whether you or me like them or not, they are a major player.

now we just need china and a couple more euro countries to join in on the fun.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

whether you or me like them or not, they are a major player.

No Russia is not a major player. Remember those estimates about Russia taking Ukraine in a week, two weeks tops? Those estimates were based on Russia being a near peer. That assessment was incorrect. Russia is not a near peer.

Also Russia's capabilities have been significantly diminished because of the war in Ukraine. They can't project power anymore. Russia is devolving down to the level of North Korea. They have nukes, so have to be considered, but no real capability to project power. Not a major player.

And other countries are involved. China is somewhat involved on the diplomatic front. But guess what their priorities are? They're against Iran's "Axis of Resistance" attacking shipping routes between Europe and Asia. Because obviously.

So it's basically just Russia+Iran against everyone else in the world. At this point it seems like Iran is struggling to keep their proxies under control. Not exactly WW3.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Well it did say major players, plural. If you have major players directly in opposition and both feeling the need for conscription...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You don't think Russia is a major player in this current shitshow? Or was it an attempt to belittle Russia?

I'm assuming its the latter because otherwise you're a dense motherfucker

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

some major players are already doing this.

yay ww3, just what we needed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

It's a world war only when western european countries are involved. Otherwise it's just sparkling conflict.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It's not a war until the other side is able to fight back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

U.S. military forces today conducted strikes on seven facilities, which included more than 85 targets in Iraq and Syria, that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and affiliated militias use to attack U.S. forces. This is the start of our response. The President has directed additional actions to hold the IRGC and affiliated militias accountable for their attacks on U.S. and Coalition Forces.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

damn straight, feel the love

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They used B-1s, lol.

That's a lot of finding out they just got.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Need to make space for the raiders which came in early and under budget.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully, they don't lose 1/3rd of their navy accidentally... again.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you hoping that they don't? Given the shenanigans the Iranian navy has been up to, promoting much of it to submersible status would be a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Well, to be honest, this was a sarcastic comment to the time the US did accidentally sink more of their navy than intended. (A little more than 1/3 if their operational force.) The original goal was only 4 platforms IIRC. It may have grown a scotch before the end.

Which probably doesn't mean much to the sailors. Hind sight being 20/20 and all. Still a bit of an oops.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The idiot puppet of Israel.
They're happy to throw away money like this and then complain about the sorry state of their democracy. Americans..

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are some posts that always seem unbalanced considering the communities voting history. This seems like one of them. Do the mods or users have a way to check on bots?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying that I am a bot?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, not at all. These communities overwhelmingly support Palestine and think the US is enabling the genocide. There are a few posts where support for Israel is highly upvoted at first. I'm saying those seem influenced by bots or PR campaigns. I'm wondering if this post is a similar situation. I don't understand why you were so heavily downvoted.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh I get you now.
Yeah could totally be that, but also consider that when elections are close americans tends to behave like hooligans and their tollerance for criticism of their candidate become very low.

Treating Biden like an saint will become more and more common as elections approach. Been there before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at you, simping for Iran.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's how the world is: black and white. You must be known as a great mind among your people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hell yeah we just won in Afghanistan this is a great moment to start another winnable war in the middle east. Thanks Biden.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Iran is not Afghanistan. They are massively different countries.

End of list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The attacks are the first of many expected to take place.

Washington Post's Dan Lamothe has said that while the U.S. struck more than 85 individual targets in Iraq and Syria, these were spread just eight general locations in those two countries.

U.S. officials have stressed that there is no plans currently to strike targets in Iran.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't this all because the usa is supporting Israel and Iran is pushing back against countries supporting the genocide there?

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Ah yes Iran, that great bastion of human rights where they throw gay people off buildings and stone people to death.

Iran doesn't give a shit about Palestinians. Instability in the region keeps them in relative power. Everything they do should be viewed in that light.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instability in the region keeps them in relative power.

how is that so?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because with stability, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen would have control of the world's trade through the Red Sea and Suez Canal. Making tons of money on shipping through the region. Their regional power is de facto because other countries in the region are unstable and can't secure trade through the canal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how does that consolidate their power? i tought they didnt have direct influence over the canal, and are even trying to set up an alternative?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

To anyone visualizing a comically long canal running straight through like 5 countries, you're not actually far off. Unfortunately, it's just a railroad to Moscow.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›