this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22503 readers
3345 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden’s approval rating was now 37% in favor and 60% disapproved, Kornacki noted.

It’s “the lowest approval rating since former President George W. Bush’s second term,” said Welker.

On voters’ confidence in handling the U.S. economy, Kornecki pointed to Trump’s 55% rating and Biden’s 33%.

Edit: here's the MSNBC clip with Kornacki https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1754211558631084417

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This garbage article didn't even say who did the poll.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's from NBC News...

Poll: 20-point deficit on handling economy highlights Biden’s struggles against Trump. The president’s approval rating has fallen to a new low in NBC News polling, as Trump narrowly leads in a 2024 general election matchup.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/poll-biden-trump-economy-presidential-race-rcna136834

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So instead of posting that, you posted this trash article? Why?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read the one I posted first and then found you the NBC News source

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about waiting until you find a non-shit source before you post next time?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about waiting until you find a non-shit source before you post next time?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you want to live in an echo chamber and only hear that everything is roses and butterflies in the Biden campaign? Or do you want reality?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want you to post sources that aren't shit. Like the second one you provided.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you provide a list of these Flying Squid approved sources? Huffington Post, no. NBC News, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I literally told you which source was a good source. It has nothing to do with being 'approved,' it has to do with your original source being sensationalist garbage that didn't even say who conducted the poll. Do you really not understand why that's problematic?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

[an NBC person] “Over time, we have been testing for five years now, going back to 2019—a Biden-Trump match-up. Remember 2019, 2020 Joe Biden led. He led big in every single one of our polls. For the first time in November, Donald Trump pulled ahead in our poll. And now, at five points, this is the biggest lead NBC has ever had in 16 polls for Donald Trump over Joe Biden.”

It’s not the clearest, but the information is there.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude all you do is shit on Biden, and you find all sorts of dubious sources to do so. Are you sure you are left leaning?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think it's fair to make people aware of what Democrats are up against here. There's an actual risk that Trump will return to the oval office if we don't show up to vote. And, unfortunately, Democrats don't show up to vote nearly as consistently as Republicans, so it's a real risk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regardless you really have been on a Biden busting bender. Are you actually voting for Trump?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody is allowed to be critical of our politicians? What is this gatekeeping?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Nice complete dodge of the question.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No you can be critical, hell look through my history... But this type of "points" news is a known tactic to demoralize. However, if you are trumpeting for Trump, at least be up front about it so we can sort you properly.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The most idiotic part of this is the statement that it’s the lowest for an incumbent president since GWB. Guess what? Bush won reelection. The same thing is happening here. Biden is polling low, but will win. No one wants the dictator Trump in office.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

W was the start of the current polarization era with Obama being the catalyst for the tea party chuds to pour fuel on the fire. With the current polarization, you’ll never see a president have the same sort of general approval or popularity we used to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Weird how the Quinnipac poll from Friday said the opposite. It's almost like the Media wants a horse race & you're a sucker for it.

There is a reason these polls ask how you feel instead of who you plan on voting for.

Also, +5 points? Nationwide Dems have been beating polls at the ballot box by +9 points since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Why use yahoo news?

It's all rehosted content, and for some reason freezes my phones browser like half the time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I will not take any of these statistics until the real thing happens. They've done this bullshit back in 2020 and the result took most by surprise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We've been ringing the alarm for awhile now, is it time to replace Biden to stop Trump?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

With whom? Harris and Newsom both poll losing to Trump. Harris is less popular than Biden, and Newsom isn't an incumbent. Biden is the candidate in 24 for the same reason he was in 20. He's the best candidate to beat Trump.

The people "ringing the alarm" are out of touch socialists and anarchists, and more frequently, Republicans, foreign operatives, and grievancers who aren't voting anyway.

I would have loved to see a Sanders presidency in my lifetime. Well, it didn't happen. Fortunately, Joe Biden has proven a remarkably effective president under phenomenally difficult circumstances, and his bad numbers are less a product of his administration and more the result of record voter unhappiness and the stranglehold of Trump on US politics. That's not a problem that's solved by pushing a new candidate on stage, because any other Democrat is going to have the same baggage or worse, assuming they're not outright unelectable.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey, some of us out-of-touch socialists are voting for Biden anyway.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm an out of touch socialist myself, and I'll be voting for Joe Biden with my head held high. Point is there's a lot of sacrifice-the-good-for-the-perfect "left-wing" protesting on here that will suppress voter turnout by attempting to dampen enthusiasm for President Biden. Taking it at face value, it's coming from people who are unhappy he's not a European socialist; being a little more cynical, I find it hard to believe anyone who suggests we drop the incumbent mid-primary season doesn't have an ulterior motive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

My philosophy is that if you vote for the lesser of two evils, which some feel is what is going on in this election, the net result is less evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, it looks like it's too late now and we might get another Trump presidency. Great job Dems! Infuriating! Before you say "are you voting for Biden?" I'm in California and will not. My vote doesn't matter here. I'll still be voting for all the other local elections though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

"I choose to be part of the problem."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I don't think most anybody is ecstatic with either. The fly in the ointment is that these two parties are not beholden to the electorate at all - they run exactly who they please, and their 'primaries' are ultimately an at-will dog and pony show.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet no one can ever say who could/would replace him. Curious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

is it time to replace Biden

And by what anti-democratic process are you suggesting this be done?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›