this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
343 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned

21031 readers
593 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I always assumed credit scores were an integral and historic part of the American financial system.

They were not, they are very recent,most of your parents didn't have credit scores growing up, and as you can probably tell or at least intuit, it's mostly just a b******* scheme for those with capital to accrue more capital by invading your privacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31415926535@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I tried to open a bank account at a credit union while homeless. Had $42k on my direct express card, finally on SSI, lump sum was for the previous year while unable to work.

No debts, never used a credit card. Couldn't open a bank account. Had to go thru a program that assigned me a fake credit card debt that I had to pay off for 6 months to get my credit score high enough.

Credit scores are a scam.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sorry but that credit union sucks and you needed to move on. Credit unions should never deny someone an checking or savings account if they do not have a history of abuse.

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Indeed. As evidenced by the fact that doing things that are money-smart (in general, stuff that amounts to avoiding debt) is actually harmful to a credit score. The powers that be want you to consume on borrowed funds.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

This is my point, thank you for sharing your story.

If you are injured, not lucky or born into less fortunate circumstances, this credit system will stop you from taking control of your life.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

It's depressing what happens when we give corporations the leeway to do whatever they want, isn't it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It sucks but things were worse before, especially if you were black.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or an immigrant. Or a woman (especially if you're pregnant). Or if you lived near black people or immigrants. Or if you had long hair. Or maybe the local bank manager just didn't like you. These were all acceptable reasons to deny your loan application prior to credit scores.

They literally made decisions based on things you can't control. Banks are now legally prohibited from even asking these things. If you notice, people working at a bank will never ask "where are you from?"

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck I sound like a bootlicker but the net result was that it took away some control of the rich to influence social mobility.

But rich people are living organisms and their think tanks are the smartest. They’ve already found ways around it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As time moves on, a lot of things containing racial bias have gotten more abstract. For example, we don't segregate schools by law anymore, but African-Americans do tend to live in neighborhoods together, those neighborhoods tend to have lower property values, and schools are funded by the taxes on property values. Segregation is still there, but you have to go a few layers deep to find it.

However, as its been forced to get more abstract, it's also become less effective. Without absolute prohibitions against African-Americans attending the same schools as white people, there has been more upwards mobility of African-Americans to live in better neighborhoods with better schools and end cycles of poverty. Still, it would be better if we got rid of this dumb property tax system for schools altogether.

Credit scores are the same. It abstracted away the racism. It's still there, causing unnecessary hardship, but not to the degree previous systems did. There is more room for upwards mobility, but that doesn't mean we should leave it as it is.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

However, as its been forced to get more abstract, it’s also become less effective. Without absolute prohibitions against African-Americans attending the same schools as white people, there has been more upwards mobility of African-Americans to live in better neighborhoods with better schools and end cycles of poverty.

That's highly debatable. There are definitely some groups of African Americans who have cracked the glass ceiling. But on average, black household wealth has significantly lagged white wealth accumulation year-over-year. Case in point, the '08 crash decimated black households to the tune of 40% of their total accumulated savings. The COVID crisis saw higher rates of mortality in black communities, as well as higher rates of unemployment, of declines in school completion rates (from high school up through graduate programs), and of divorce. All negatively correlated with wealth accumulation.

Maybe since '89 things have improved. But the last two decades have sucked and African Americans have eaten disproportionate amounts of shit during it.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Came here to say this. Credit scores are meant to remove some of the racial and social bias from the decision making. That was the idea anyway.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean this is how it has to be. It can be improved further.

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While true, don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yes, and I'm only making the opposite counter-point: Don't stop doing a good thing, like fixing broken systems.

I love it how everyone enjoys pointing out the negative interpretation when it's in response to something that makes it utterly clear I mean the positive interpretation.

You may as well be saying, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", which I'm sure is not what you mean, but that's exactly what responding with a counter-view implies at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sosodev@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Credit scores didn’t exist but credit bureaus date back to the mid 1800s in the USA. Also, as others have mentioned creditors would do their due diligence and try to assert that you would be able to pay back your loans by doing many of the same things they do now.

This really isn’t some new, crazy concept like you’re making it out to be. The score has only simplified the process.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

The score simplified the process for creditors of pre-assessing your risk as a debtor so that they don't have to put in the work to actually assess your rush a debtor, leading to an irresponsible and imbalanced credit system that you can't benefit from unless you are born on the right side of the tracks.

I didn't say the concept was new or crazy.

This is a way for operators of capital to accrue more capital and more easily distance themselves from everybody else, whose information they profit from, rather than creating opportunities.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back in the seventies/early eighties, I remember my grandmother getting financial privilege by showing the check numbers in her checkbook, which were in the high thousands.

If you ran around bouncing checks, you would get cut off long before that and have to start over at the dreaded check number 101.

Such simpler times.

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ahhhh so thats why in the late 80s you could start your checks at 1000+

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine someone handed you check #001 for $1000...would you really trust it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when there wasn't a proprietary algortithm giving everyone a social credit score and instead you had to get a letter from an existing member to signify your trustworthiness?

I dont like the proprietary nature of credit algos, but I'm not a fan of the letter system either

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I prefer the occasional letter to the constant, invasive proprietary algorithm.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's not like they didn't look through your financial history before then - they just didn't have to show their working publicly, which meant you could ne discriminated against for any number of things

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So the same now, except now all personal data is located in one place according to the rules they set, from which they can sell your data and preemptively block you or refuse to meet you to discuss your practical repayment capability.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

All of those could be and were done before, only it wasn't public so you had no way to also know your score.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] markr@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s our version of China’s social credit score.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except we don't get the free housing and tuition, the cheap and efficient mass transit, or the retirement at age 55.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

There's no such thing as "China's social credit score". All of thar came from small local projects and miss translating articles.

Edit: https://youtu.be/Kqov6F00KMc for the 10000 people whose just today are learning about it.

Your social score has increased to: 🌟🌟🌟🌟

Thank you for your continued support in defense of this system. Your alliegance has been noted.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is not true. I have had Chinese friends tell me that for example you cannot fly on a plane if your social score is too low.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what does Mr. Translating have to say about the situation?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Not even close 🤣 what an absurd thing to say. You really think following social rules is the same thing as participating and having a financial history of posting back lent money is the same thing?

Edit you know what, never mind I see you all trying to compare imaginary insurance Facebook scenarios and pretending like that's how a FICO works. 👌👍.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (9 children)

When I was younger, I was denied housing because I had no credit rating. Not a bad rating mind you, but no rating at all, because I did not use credit cards or anything else that would get me in Experian's system. I was penalized for never accruing debt. The system is absurd.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Trashcan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (17 children)

In Norway having loads of credit cards is negative for getting a house loan as it is potential debt that goes against your payment ability for the house loan.

Meaning we do have a credit score system for getting loans and more stuff on various credit solutions, but credit cards works against larger loans.

Which can be a pain in the ass when you want to buy a house/apartment and have credit cards that might deny you the last bit of money to win the bidding war...

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct. Credit scores are bullshit.

The idea is fine, but when they’re run by the credit bureaus, they’re subject to extreme corruption. Even if run by the government, as they should be, they’d be subject to extreme corruption.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The whole financial system is only about 50 years old

[–] jadedwench@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will just leave this here. Your employers can snitch on you as well and just give all of your paystubs to...Equifax. It was shocking to see which ones did and which ones did not.

https://employees.theworknumber.com/employee-data-freeze

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The first time I saw this I was shocked. Every single paycheck of mine is there and there's basically nothing you can do about it without having negative credit impacts for having manually disabled it. Why on earth is this opt-out rather than opt-in? Then it wouldn't look like you're trying to hide something if you value your privacy at all.

It's crazy this is legal. So dystopian.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Credit scores have existed for decades, as the article states. It's specifically the FICO system that was started in 1989.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DesertMagma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steelrat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait until you hear about Dunn & Bradstreet and Moody's

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's a silly system but really not that hard to do well. Put everything on credit card and set everything to auto pay the statement. That alone will give you good enough credit with little effort.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You forgot the most important part: never have an unexpected expense, like going to a hospital or your car breaking down.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

We got a new card, no interest for a year. Put our entire kitchen reno on it. Credit score went down 47 points altogether. Paid it all off, credit score went up 17 points. All of this inside 6 months. It doesn't make sense lol.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Yup, and pretend that your credit card is your debit card. I never pay for anything with my credit card unless I know that I can clear the balance immediately after if I had to.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

FICO is kinda stupid in some ways but with responsibility it's not hard to get a decent rate/favorable score. Yes at the top end is dumb you need to open more credit but in practice that's not hard to do assuming you aren't just forced by circumstances to just live off credit.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments