Please let's all remember that these are child actors, and they are no responsible for the poor writing or direction in the show. We can be sure they have worked extremely hard and poured their lives into this show, and the ones we should be disappointed with are the showrunners.
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)
Television
4874 readers
1 users here now
Redirected - Please see [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If the acting is bad, we can be mad at the casting director as well. It doesn't really matter if they're child actors, that doesn't make them immune from being called bad actors. They don't deserve to get dunked on or solely blamed for the show, but let's not pretend they don't play a part in its quality. If they were amazing actors, I'd assume you'd have no issue giving them praise? Why is the opposite not true?
If they were amazing actors, I'd assume you'd have no issue giving them praise? Why is the opposite not true?
Because they're children dude. Praise does not have harmful psychological consequences. There is no downside to giving a child credit for doing something well. There is tremendous harm in attacking a child over something they did objectively correctly, but inevitably not to the impossible standards of armchair critics whose entire presence on the Internet is built on giving exaggerated and heartless criticism.
like the kid that played Anakin in Star Wars. he caught so much shit over it, that he gave up acting all together.
In 2012, Lloyd explained that his decision to retire from acting in 2001 was due to bullying at school and harassment by the press, both in response to his role in The Phantom Menace.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Giving praise when it's not warranted can be bad.
It should be shown that there is nothing wrong with doing something poorly, and it gives a chance for constructive criticism. I've always (kindly mind you) helped the creative kids throughout my life by showing them where they can improve and why. Feel like that gives them more agency and respect than a constant "Of course you did great! You always do great!".
Feels good to give praise, but kids pick up on the bs.
Of course don't be cruel, and attack and exaggerate (which I don't think the person you're replying to was suggesting), but be honest. Kids are people and grow in their abilities the same way. Only getting praise is not the way to grow.
That's like saying drinking water can be bad. It's technically true, but not really relevant to this context.
Let the kids family, friends, directors, whatever people are actually involved in those children's lives handle the constructive criticism. The scrutiny these children face is monumental already. There's no reason for some rando online to give unsolicited acting advice to child actors, and we both know that's not even remotely how the vast majority of armchair movie critics are going to express their opinions.
The problem is people tend to go way the hell overboard when it comes to criticism and some child actors can't handle it. Look at what happened with Jake Lloyd as an example. Best to just leave the children out of the criticism and make it about the adults who made the decisions.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Complete false equivalency. Do you think positive and negative are the same thing?
Strawman argument.
If a kid plays the piano in a shitty way, it's okay to say "well, he sucks."
Edit: Fuck, man. I didn't say to say it to his face! Let's just say that it's okay to think "well, he sucks." You CANNOT tell me you don't think this way if the kid says "I've been practicing for months" and you see him just smashing the keyboard. Stop being emotional. If the kid asks for my opinion, I'd probably say "good job! Good effort, keep practicing!" But for sure, I'll be thinking "welp, he sucks."
actually no. That's called being an asshole. You can say that he has room to improve, or that he's still learning, or literally anything but "wow they just suck" like some asshole.
No strawman. One is positive and one is negative. That's why they are different lol
And no it's not really okay. You should encourage children.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I've only watched the first 2 episodes, and yeah some of the performances come off quite bad, but I think the editing is at least partially to blame. They hold on characters too long and at odd moments completely destroying any sense of natural tempo in conversations.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Even with each of its eight episodes clocking in at about an hour each, it would have been difficult for Netflix’s Avatar to hit all of the same beats as the lengthier cartoon.
Ah well theres your problem. I was actually rooting for this to be good but surprise surprise, Netflix is still shit.
I mean, to be fair, 8 episodes at 1 hour each is more or less the same runtime that 20 episodes of ~20 min each. The problem is not the amount of episodes, it's just bad direction.
Same runtime maybe, but not the same pace. Would you have them just switch from one story to another a third of the way through the episode?
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
They got my hopes up with One Piece.
That's a shame.
The One Piece live action blew me away. I had the lowest expectations too, so it was quite a surprise.
Really? I thought it was adequate at best.
Had you seen it before? The live action was my first real introduction and I really enjoyed it.
Just finished watching Episode 1. Don't care what the reviews say. It's a great show. Decent acting and pretty good SFX. Looking forward to Ep. 2.
Watching the latest trailer it’s very easy to see the poor acting. It’s pretty bad when you catch a 3 second glimpse of a scene and can see in those few seconds just how poorly the acting and dialogue is, ooof.
Wait until you go back to watch the original cartoon and find it's just a competent kids show for two seasons and one season of rushed nothing.
Maybe the reason these adaptations keep not working is because the source material isn't actually the magnum opus the people who watched it when they were 10 years old think it is.
Maybe it's just cursed, but the conversation around this show feels a lot like Star Wars that way.
I was 25 when the show premiered and watched it a few years later based on recommendations from a colleague. Me and my wife loved it, it's definitely not just a show that only works for 10 year olds.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's funny you think that. I did watch the animated show when I was much younger and gave it a rewatch recently. I'm in my early 30s and as far as animated TV shows go it's still one of my favorites
My kid and I have watched the show a dozen times. I couldn't disagree more.
I was 21 when the original first came out and I thought it was excellent then. Definitely not just for kids.
lmao they hated him for telling the truth
Me and my family like it. They grew up with the original and didn't know a live action was in the works until I started it up yesterday.
We also liked Netflix's Cowboy Bebop but all the neckbeards managed to cancel it fast.
Yeah I liked bebop, and one piece, and this too. The only note I would have on this is regarding iroh. It seems like the actor is playing him 100% sober, so we lose a bit of the iroh charm I think.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Is it at least better than the first one?
Much better. This one does not make me want to go to Lake Laogai and get brainwashed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
M Night Shamalan get bored or something? Wasn't his movie a big enough kick in the dick?
There is no movie in ba sing se
Is there any anime-remake that's not a disapointment?
Maybe it's an unpopular opinion, but I thought the new One Piece hit all the emotional beats of the anime even if it didn't get all the details the same. I wasn't disappointed, although I was prepared to be.
Is Avatar even really anime though? That's kinda like calling Taco Bell Mexican food.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Speed Racer and Alita: Battle Angel were good.
Sadly bad live action will devalue rare good live action shows like One Piece, because people will skip it as being another bad show, while it isn't.
Wow. Check out the reviews on Imdb. This is what thousands of fake reviews look like.
Compare this graph to the most well received movies and shows. Let's say, The Godfather. This allegedly got way, way better reviews than The Godfather.
This looks like a pretty normal statistical distribution. Just glancing at it. What makes you think it's thousands of fake votes? I'm genuinely curious what you are seeing.
I did not care for The Godfather.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›