this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
427 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22786 readers
3830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago

Rest in power.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, that's kinda obvious ain't it?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Some are trying to paint him as suicidal rather than this being the act of protest that it is.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Self-immolation is one of the absolute worst ways to end yourself. If he was in the army and just suicidal, he'd have way better options to do it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's definitely both. Lighting yourself on fire to make a point is a terrible idea. If your goal is to bring about change, killing yourself actively works against that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes I have. And you're only thinking about that moment because another occurrence happened recently.

You'll even recognize if you're honest about this that the situation for most people did not change. In Yemen they even got dramatically worse.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Terrible idea, yes. Powerful form of protest? Also, yes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Not protest. It's giving up with style.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yet here we are talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The sad fact is that mentally stable people do not burn themselves to death in protest. He got too wrapped up in current events when he should have been spending time with family and friends (and probably doctors too).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not if you're NPR apparently.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Not as if he wasn't screaming "Free Palestine!" for as long as he could or anything

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mentally ill people burning themselves to death in protest is a lot more dramatic than angry facebookposting but fundamentally accomplishes about the same thing. Sorry we lost a good airman for nothing...seek help if you're feeling suicidal folks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

What should he have done?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's the only real crime you can think of, really?

Hmmm.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He asked, what would you do if you lived in a genocidal state?

My answer "always have been".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say at least half of all modern nations, but yeah the US is one of the better examples

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yup the US was an apartheid state from the start as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ridiculous. It was a flawed democracy not comparable to apartheid, which literally is a system where a minority group rules the majority group without consent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tell that to the natives. tell that to the slave population it held. tell that to the current incarcerated population.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah bud it's pretty much all bloodshed all the way back through human history. But right now with America as the only world superpower, it is better than has ever been for more people than ever before. If we take your approach, nobody has a right to anything, everyone is a colonizer and rapist. The world is always going to be half terrible, you are letting perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, defend current atrocities now because "the past was worse". Wait, people couldn't own things before America? There have always been docile people as well so I think you may just be exaggerating on those points.

America isn't the only superpower though. And why do you think they are such a superpower? Could it be because of all the free prison labor we have and all of the unpaid labor that went into US infrastructure both during and after slavery was abolished?

The world doesn't have to be half terrible and if the US is such a good powerful supernation, why doesn't it fix the very problems that it causes? I think its because the US is an ultra-capitalist empire and requires all of the suffering it takes to maintain that empire.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wait the US is giving Hawaii back?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sound like a flat earther.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

did you know that the US is illegally occupying hawaii?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was not aware there was presently an armed conflict in Hawaii and that the islands were under military control by the US. Do you mean that they were illegally annexed? Yeah I suppose I am aware that America sponsored a coup there.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Aaron Bushnell got CNN to say the word Genocide on live TV. Even when talking about marches with 1 million people CNN called it war.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

WOW!!! CNN said "genocide"??? Holy fuck pack it up boys, the work is done.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I could make CNN say “babaabooey” if I put it in a manifesto prior to setting myself on fire.

They’ve said “genocide” before. This did nothing but silence one voice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it will be right back out of the news cycle next week.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Buddhist monk didn't keep staying in the news for 20 years either. The world moves on. They want new stuff every day.

Global attention for a cause for (more than) a day achieved by a single person absolutely extraordinary.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh you mean the monk who set himself on fire in 1963? And totally stopped the Vietnam war by 1973.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I mean it made you make a comment. Regardless of your opinion, it still did something.