this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
1058 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7547 readers
3355 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's amazing how some of the most controversial topics are basically just "let's try being nice to people"

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

Left wing ideology in a nutshell

[–] RamblingPanda 48 points 1 year ago

The FBI added you to the list

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“one Thursday, nearly two thousand years after one man had been nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"Why are they nailing him to that cross? What did he do?"

"He said... 'Be kind to one another'."

(Sighs) "...Yeeaah, that'll do it."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the "forcing people to be what we consider nice" part that's usually the issue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Oh you're so right, those poor people being forced to not be intentionally mean to lgbtq people, women, immigrants, etc. It's so obvious when you think about it, all the transphobes, misogynists, homophobes, and racists are just being nice from their perspective. They must just come from a culture where having less rights because of your gender or who you're attracted to or where you were born is a sign of respect. We've all been so wrong to suppress them from expressing their love for others in their own unique way. I know I for one will make sure to thank the next person I see being mean to someone now that I understand the true meaning.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It always reminds me of the Bill Burr interview:

The news anchor is going, "Bill, aren't you being a little hard on those people?" In reference to something like clergymen raping boys.

And Bill is like, "How do you think those boys feel?"

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

This might be not the right place to ask, but is there a theory or phenomenon that explains why so many people side with the perpetrators/people in power when abuses are being commented on?

Sympathizing with the clergyman in your example, or another pop culture example I've seen recently is defending private jet usage.

The easy answer is "brainworms", but there must be more to it than that, surely?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I think it's people not feeling comfortable taking an active position. Condemning child rapists is still taking an active position even if it's a no brainer. Some people just see someone being condemned or criticised and instinctively defend the target. I'm not sure if it stems from contrarianism or empathy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

maybe people are defensive about their prior ignorance/apathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Modern developed countries should not have homeless people."

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"Having a job is not a social obligation."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Having a job is not a social obligation."

“What do you do?” is the first question asked when meeting someone new.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I start with my hobbies and only mention my job if they ask directly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I noticed a gap in your resume. Why don’t you have an address? Do you have reliable transportation?

Try getting married without a job? Try getting a home, a car, a bank loan without a job? Our whole society runs on jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Contributing something to society is a social obligation, otherwise you’re riding everyone else’s labor for free.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, like those lazy housewives and people with disabilities that keep them from working are just freeloaders!

Don't get me started on children, they are the worst!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Landlords and CEOs are parasites riding everyone else’s labor for free.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Calm down, edgelord.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Right wingers think this is an insanely dangerous idea. In my youth someone bought me a copy of Atlas Shrugged after hearing me say things like that.

I realized that they were trying to indoctrinate me, but I was confident in my own judgement and wanted to know my enemy better. Even if I would've been susceptible to the brainwashing, that book was insanely long and insanely boring, so they chose poorly. I couldn't get through even half of it

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wow what an antisemitic bitch /s

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I didn't think it would be necessary but looks like I should add it 🤣

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

PLEASE STOP KILLING ~~PEOPLE~~

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By killing every single living being looking for food that gets remotely close to a farm. All just so that vegans can be malnourished and have to rely on basically drugs in order to live.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Congratulations, you are wearing the suit in the meme.

[–] Squirrelanna 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meat is just a nutrient supplement administered orally.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Our survival relies on death, even if it's just plants. The people gate is an important one, even if you want to expand it wider.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also vegans with the stop killing animals sign

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Then their signs should read: Stop Breeding Animals.

Vegans are ultimately advocating for the extinction of farm animals.

There are a lot of animals that only exist because they are tasty or useful in some other way. Their species would never survive in the specks of wilderness we have left.

If you can't finding it naturally roaming Yellowstone or some other national park, it's reasonable safe to assume that species wouldn't exist if we didn't farm them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I lost braincells reading this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not like they would actually go extinct entirely, they would just evolve in a different direction and have much smaller populations. There are wild bovines, turkeys, swines, etc. If chickens were cut loose to live in the wild, they could probably do alright for themselves, but you might see other traits favored than maximum egg-laying capacity or rapid growth that only serves to maximize farmer profit by reducing the time to be able to sell them off, for example. Local populations would likely collapse until they reached a more stable level, too, given they would have more limited food available, absent someone constantly feeding them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Expecting them to evolve isn't realistic. Evolution isn't magic; it takes many generations. These aren't fruit flies.

Most farm animals are invasive species and it would be highly irresponsible to cut them loose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Forgive me but I about to apply this political cartoon to the situation with Palestine and Joe Biden.

Forgoing the political defeat of Trump to send a message is extreme.

The same message that has fallen on deaf ears for the past 80+ yesrs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Refusing to listen to voters you depend on in order to get elected is extreme. And before you say "Biden would lose the election if he cut off weapons to Israel!!" then those people who would refuse to vote for him are the ones who you should be shaming. Not only are they willing to forgo the political defeat of Trump to send a message they're doing it because they want to keep supporting genocide.

At some point some amount of blame needs to be leveled at the so called "moderate voters" of the party. They are the majority after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›