this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
721 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

12869 readers
61 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Convert corporations into Worker Consumer Cooperatives to prevent investor wealth accumulation and regulatory capture and align business towards worker and consumer interests rather than short-term profit seeking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Legalizing Prostitution just creates more Human Trafficking, as a result of allowing human traffickers to operate in the open under the guise of legality. We have decades of evidence that lead to this conclusion. We don't need to keep trying it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm ill informed on this one. Do you have a source you like?

I was under the impression that if it were made legal, it would make more difficult criminal behavior. Sunshine being a disinfectant and all that. Plus being less dangerous for any given sex worker.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"We find that countries with legalized prostitution have a statistically significantly larger reported incidence of human trafficking inflows. This holds true regardless of the model we use to estimate the equations and the variables we control for in the analysis. Also, the main finding is not dominated by trafficking to a particular region of the world." SOURCE

This is a study that references many other studies going back decades with data examining differences between 150 countries.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

5% tax on highest bracket not nearly enough. Normal citizens pay like 30%, they should reduce the normal bracket to somewhere around 10-15 percent, raise top bracket to about 49%, and tax businesses at the same rate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Stop I can only get so erect

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I am actually not sure about the coroprate home ownership point. Here in Germany renting is much more common and accepted compared to the US, and i think there are lots of situations where this makes sense. However both in the US and here in Germany the systems need changes. And i think they should mostly target land ownership rather than the houses themself. What drives up the prices in desired areas are mostly increases in land value, not that building houses got that much more expensive (although that is also a factor).

And most of that value gain are from external factors rather than the owners own merit. If someone builds an architectually great and energy efficient house or develops land, then it is fine if he gains value from it. But if simply owning the property improves the value over time, because society around it builds nice schools, parks and so on. Then the owner hasn't done anything and that profit should be taxed completely away. If that makes sense.

That said there probably should also be a mechanism to support the first home people own to counteract scale efficiencies that corporations might be able to leverage.


Not sure if outright banning stocks for politicians is the way to go, but there should be more points regarding transparancy and conflicts of interest. Also not just during their time in office, but after that aswell.

I'd have no issue with politicians holding a borad market index fund.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think the actions on this list would improve economic conditions for the middle class.

I’ll just say if prostitution is legalized, then there needs to be something that ensures that someone isn’t coerced into it somehow, or sex trafficked into it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You forgot to add abolishing slavery.

Considering that lemmy.world is pretty much just a ball of pearl-clutching white liberalism these days it's not very surprising.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sure, but be careful with "universal basic income" ,"taxes" and actual national expenses.

What you have there is a wish list. It's a good wishlist, but an actual plan requires planning. Including how the math works out. Which can be done, but you still need to do it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Are you trying to fix systemic problems of government structure or pass laws? They are different things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

eh.. is there a reason why "abolish slavery" happens to NOT be on that list? i'ld put it right on top!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not necessary, already solved with the 13th amendment. This is a list of solutions which have not yet been implemented.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

which part of "except as a punishment" was actually unclear in those laws that currently still "protect" slavery since how many centuries now? did you already ask your gov how many are enslaved due to this slavery protection law today? do you know how many are today tortured because slaves still do not have any laws protecting them? tell me which laws you think would protect slaves today from torture? could they call a lawyer? by which law if they dont have rights? this "don't have rights" was a huge part of slavery, right? so tell me, as this law clearly states the possibility of slaves, which laws would protect them? how could you tell if there are no other mentionings in any other law? i guess you just can't, because this law protects slavery but no law protects the victims of it.

so if you did not ask your government yet about the total numbers (which could be 0 of course as you claim), on what "knowledge" are your believes based on then? pls let me know!

i remember news about children put into cages at the southern border, i remember that originally a five digit number of families was in the news, later on claims, that those kids were sexually abused instead of beeing taken care for, they tried to find them but only got a low 4 digit number of them back. what would you say happened to those at "unknown locations"? i do see a "possible" direct link to the slavery-protection by law you seem to believe would actually "prohibit" it.

Just having this exception in the laws degrades the credibility of the whole country. Why not get rid of this shit then?

And thus if you were right that slavery does not happen any more (wow cool, a real step towards civilisation) then it should also not be of any problem of any kind to remove that exception from the laws right today before sunset, right? who would even hesitate?? if there are none who currently "profit" from that law, or who are already planning to profit from it by creating false evidences of "crimes" sufficient to apply this laws to innocent ones in front of some of those "secret courts", if none of such exists, why not just remove this exemption then and if only to really have more civilized law afterwards ???

IMHO "abolish slavery" needs to be on that list, so this list could have any meaning at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You could pay for a whole bunch of that with a Land Value Tax.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for this approximate description of most Nordic countries.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It’s all wishful thinking, but certainly makes sense within the context of a suggestion to improve our QOL.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί