Thank you for bringing nuance to this discussion.
5gruel
Sir this is a wendy's
Also had a look at their comment history, does not look very damning to me. Can you link a comment you are referring to?
What are you on about?
It's an opinion piece talking about not jumping through the hoops of Musk's outrage tactic. https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2025-01/elon-musk-hitlergruss-amtseinfuehrung-donald-trump
The same newspaper had the full video online a few days earlier.
There are exceptetions to that law: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafgesetzbuch_section_86a
Subsection (1) shall not be applicable if the means of propaganda or the act serves to further civil enlightenment, to avert unconstitutional aims, to promote art or science, research or teaching, reporting about current historical events or similar purposes
If there are reasons for German newspapers to omit Musk's Hitler salute, that's not it.
A quick look at german Newspapers would tell you that this statement is false
https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2025-01/elon-musk-kritik-hitlergruss-geste https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/elon-musks-arm-geste-reaktion-auf-angeblichen-hitlergruss,UaVppB4 https://taz.de/Elon-Musks-Hitlergruss/!6060000/
Out of the goodness oft his heart?
That's some weird gatekeeping. Why stop there? Whoever is using a linter is obviously too stupid to write clean code right off the bat. Syntax highlighting is for noobs.
I full-heartedly dislike people that think they need to define some arcane rules how a task is achieved instead of just looking at the output.
Accept that you probably already have merged code that was generated by AI and it's totally fine as long as tests are passing and it fits the architecture.
So should Germany make a fuss about both instances or not? You can't have it both ways.