AWOL_muppet

joined 1 year ago
[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem with not fucking up is we have two conflicting ideologiea (or, a bit different if we're gettig technical), so one man's trash policy is anothers treasure. How can that be anythibg other than a fuck up?

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

Sounds like the interpetation of statistics becomes a very subjective game.

Any metric that becomes a target, ceases to be a useful metric and all that

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 3 points 5 days ago

Im all about transparrnt or non-existent private funding!

Ranked voting seems oromising as well.

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 days ago

Quality rant - love it and keep it up

 

I'm wanting to see more well-rounded policy that can be supported by the major parties regardless of 'who floated it', hoping for better enduring government rather than this 'rip and replace' bullshit.

Obviously with the right wong think tanks invading, this is nothing more than a thought exercise, but i reckon its worth exploring.

My heretical angle is significantly reducing thenterms that parties have in power - not extending to 4 years but instead reducing to 1 or 18 months. The thinking being: If you cant get anything done because the only work one is interested in doing is ideological nonsense that caters to a narrow part of society maybe it shouldn't get off the ground in the first place?

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

That's lovely to see. I hope it goes well, sustainably

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ha! In that case, a quality shitpost

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

Oh for sure, heartily agree. Didnt mean anything akin to 'shut up and take it.

Those 'in power' should absolutely lead by example (and there's bound to be plenty of time before the victims can actually pull back from 'defence mode' - now I'm starting to think of it in the same context as abusive relationships, however). Sorry, my analogies are all over the place!

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fair point - I'd moved on from this example of the tiered pricing to the big picture of 'how does a society eliminate racism' in principle.

You are right about this.

I do wonder what might the future look like though, when we're all trying to 'get one back' either due to responding to the systemic racism or ...bear with me here, the hypothetocal is a little gross: counter-responses: lets imagine pakeha with perceived past hurts in response to similar gestures? (as im sure there are quite a few completely blind to their privilege and so on...). I'm not saying they did the wrong thing at all with the gesture, I'm merely trying to find ways to avoid escalating things (which in hindsight sounds dangerously like 'peace at any price', but I don't think it is...).

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, I get what you mean.

I'm hoping somehow there's a way where we can get to some sort of parity and then work to de-escalate from there, but I actually just don't think humans can do that.

We really need better tools to handle our insecurities, as a species...

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

So, what's the answer then - woukd it be just declaring there is no racism in NZ and trying to keep everything 'level'?

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Charming... The main rule is 'don't be a dick', no need to come in strong.

You are correct that they had an 'emotional argument' (as opposed to a rational one - I'm sure there's better terms for these), but need you be so obnoxious about it?

 

While I'm never excited about these general uses, it seems like they did a reasonably good job with this experiment. Hopefully other Dept's don't just loosely 'throw it in'...

Some tidbits:

The AI operated on a fixed dataset. It did not collect information, nor did it tap into the main client record systems, so privacy risks were low.

It did not learn from the queries staff made or the information they used with it, and did not add that information to its learning banks, the reports said.

The two tests - first with 25 staff, then with 300 - found that along with boosts to service came gains in employee wellbeing, such as helping people with ADHD or poor hearing focus more in meetings, or those with dyslexia to revise content.

 

I was curious to hear what people think of the telecom breakup into chorus (and wasn't there a third party as well?) after all these years?

I was working there at the time, so some of the staff training was entertaining. I felt like they seemed to be on board with the general thrust of the changes, which I was a little surprised about (I expected a little more lip-service, I guess?)

Has it been a good change? I feel like the national fibre has been great but that's not actually related (but may have relied on the breakup as a precursor?)

view more: next ›