Agreed
EndlessNightmare
joined 1 year ago
There's what is stated and what is implied. In the absence of any sort of formal or "official" organization, participants get to choose their own level of involvement.
I often refer to "birthstrike" as a conceptually similar and related group.
The logic is to prevent pregnancy in an environment that has become hostile towards women's rights. Sex becomes far more dangerous if you don't have access to contraceptives and abortion.
Fwiw, I'm in a LTR with a "4B ally" (and also consider myself an ally). A key points here is that I've also had a vasectomy.
I know it doesn't seem fair, and if you look at it through the lens of punishing men then maybe it isn't. But if you view it as women protecting themselves (e.g. from pregnancy) then it makes perfect sense.
So jettison the terf component, it isn't germane to the overall goal or purpose and need not be carried over just because it is part of the South Korean 4B.
It's to protect against pregnancy in an environment where women's rights have been eroded.
If Project 2025 takes away abortion rights and even contraceptives, sex becomes a really big risk.
What a damn farce this is.
Yeah, I've already seen the name "Gavin Newsom" floated around for 2028.
DNC doesn't learn.
It was very convenient that the deadline was after the elections.
Don't know what to tell you. I'm expressing my opinion on how I personally see them, which is an entity that is openly hostile to the American public.
People voting for them doesn't negate this. It only means that people vote against their own self-interests, which is nothing new as we've seen time and time again.
That doesn't change my opinion. That alliance is to the U.S. government, not to the U.S. people. I consider them to be a hostile entity.
"What kind of fuckery is this?"