this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
472 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22232 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BoobaAwooga 99 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

This point about Bernie winning has been belabored, however consider a 2016 election where the DNC didn’t collude for Hillary. Then we have Bernie as the ticket and beating trump and never hearing of that fucker again (hopefully). What a different world it would’ve been having Bernie as the 45th president

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago (7 children)

The point is to hammer this into the thick skulls of the people running the DNC. They keep forcing shit down our throats. It's time for change.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The donors would have never stood for it, which is why the DNC did what it did.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the DNC will only support central and right leaning Capitalist candidates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They said "imagine," you potato.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Which state's primary votes did the DNC alter or override to give Hillary the nomination by popular vote instead for Bernie?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The other candidates gradually stepped aside to allow Hillary to run. The big one being Joe Biden not running as it was her "turn", allegedly after the deal between the Clintons and the Obamas.

If Biden had run in 2016, he probably would have won. And Trump would be a footnote in history.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

footnote in history

Now Trump will be at least a chapter, maybe even a whole book!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

What if I told you it was also about manipulating voter opinions.

Like how the superdelegates were all pledging their votes to Hillary way ahead of the first primaries. Or how the DNC pushed Hillary over Bernie, as was clear in the Debbie W.S. leaked DNC emails. Also, the widespread pressure from party darlings on Bernie to drop out.

Messaging from the media was to blame as well. This was reflected in:

  • Lack of coverage of the polling that showed the better margin of success in a Bernie v. Trump matchup against a Hillary v. Trump matchup. This one is especially egregious, in my opinion, since a lot of the Hillary supporters I personally knew voted for her in the primaries because they assumed she had a better chance of winning.

  • Lack of coverage about Bernie's higher popularity with independent voters in polls.

  • Widespread reporting when Hillary decided to label Bernie supporters as basement dwellers.

  • Hillary accused Bernie of being sexist and the media did terrible due diligence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah what I remember working on the campaign was a bunch of people didn't show up and fucking vote in the primary and Bernie lost. Sure, there was some fuckery that shifted momentum but at the end of the day my fellow progressives didn't get enough votes because we act like the DNC controls the outcome of the primaries and end up helping make that the reality ourselves.

If all the people bitching about the DNC and telling everyone the Democrats are a lost cause showed up to vote in the primary, Bernie would've won.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

a bunch of people didn’t show up and fucking vote .. and Bernie lost

It's obnoxious how often that's why the conservatives win.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I love Bernie. I know he would have beat Trump in 2016. Both tap into populist sentiment, albeit on different sides of the political spectrum. The difference is Bernie wouldn't have any of the baggage that Trump brings with the racism, misogyny, incoherence, etc. he would have won easily. I weep for what would have been. He would have been a champion for the working class, not the charlatan that Trump is.

I think one thing that the Republicans did that Dems didn't is they let the people pick their candidate. It's that simple. They didn't care how unpolished he was, his lack of pedigree, anything. There was no ideological purity test. They duked it out in their primary and let the people decide. Something for the Dems to learn from.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 months ago (7 children)

He’s 83 years old, older than both Trump and Biden.

I’d like to see AOC throw her hat in for 2028. She’ll be 39 then.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'd love to see this but her chances are likely worse than Harris. And that's assuming we have an honest election in '28.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, maybe not. Looking at the answers from her "AOC and Trump" voter cross-section, it seems like you just need to run someone who's "genuine." Both of them are seen as genuine or real (whether that's true or not, it doesn't matter).

Populism can cut both ways and AOC might be just the ticket we need.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

That was my primary complaint about Harris, she had the same plastic, fake insincerity Clinton did.

I mean, I voted for her ANYWAY because the alternative is just... 🤢🤮

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would love this, but the DNC likely won't learn from their mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, I've already seen the name "Gavin Newsom" floated around for 2028.

DNC doesn't learn.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As much as I love her, America will never elect a female president anytime soon. There are many men who believe the presidency is a man's job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This thread is ridiculous. A woman or a jewish person cannot be elected President of the United States. How much more evidence do you need.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They said the same thing about black people until a black man running as a progressive won the nomination. I think you've been learning the wrong lesson from all the elections since.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As impossible and abstract as it seems to realign the Democratic base by shared class interests, it’s still much a more concrete plan than “reduce bigotry in strangers”

Amen. Amen. Tried and failed, twice. Populism is the only way forward. Democrats must become the party of the poor again.

Strange thing to have to say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

He always would have. He knows how to get the people motivated and straight up fucking torqued. He hits every nail when it comes to social or economic problems. On top of it all, he's so passionate about it he'll argue until he's red in the face for us. Honestly fuck everyone who worked to move that man out of the way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

Anyone can win, just as soon as you guys stop fighting tooth and nail to keep anyone but the most moderate democrat from being allowed to compete.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (11 children)

It seemed that it was a rejection of whatever political group was in power across the globe for the most part this year. This is largely in part because the world as a whole is still healing/recovering from the damage of COVID, and in the US the Dems were left to clean up an economic disaster left by Trump. And we have a large number of people who felt the effects of inflation and for reasons I can't wrap my head around felt the Dems needed to be voted out. Then we had all the people who wanted to teach the Dems a lesson because of Gaza by making sure Trump was elected to help Israel level the area and make sure there was no future for Palestinians (which is another contradiction I can't wrap my head around).

So really I think the Dems could have had a unicorn candidate (Bernie) and they still would have lost this election, because enough people only vote for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Fucking THANK YOU, for elucidating this so cleanly into a two paragraphs.

The wandering shell shock on Lemmy for a week was miserable to witness.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you guys really believe the populist position is to "vote the Democrats out" and that Gaza was really the reason for voter apathy that effects half the population? Couldn't be messaging or effective policies being lacking, definitely blame anyone against a continually funded arsenal in the hands of aggressive governments.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Man the delusion is always so real in a circular firing squad lol.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Everyone loves Bernie.

But dang it the man is 83. He should be enjoying the last years of his life in retirement. It makes me sad to think he still needs to be working in politics.

He's as old as Trump, who is already too old for this shit, will be at the end of his term.

Maybe there should be a hard limit at 65 or something for politicians. Both to keep out people in whom dementia is clearly starting to appear and to let old people frickin' rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] imposedsensation 17 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Here from PA to tell you you're nuts, Bernie would not have won.

Also: Downvote. Since we're not mature enough to handle actual downvotes anymore.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps you'd like to elaborate?

In this case I actually think the downvotes are appropriate. It's not that you're presenting a different opinion but you're not adding any reasoning or substance to your claim

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also: Downvote. Since we're not mature enough to handle actual downvotes anymore.

Maybe you’re not…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Here from PA to disagree. I believe that if Bernie had won in 2016, his VP would be our president-elect right now, and Trump would've never attempted a return to politics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Honestly I think he would have simply because with the evidence we've seen, Americans are really that stupid and racist they as long as you promise them you'd magically fix all of their problems without any plan behind it.

Americans are rightfully concerned about the economy and I, even as a upper middle class person, was concerned about inflation but I'm pretty plugged into what's going on in the world because I have the luxury of having a job where I'm posting on Lemmy in the middle of the day.

Bernie would have offered loud, in your face I'm going to fuck corporations and get you a living wage, wither he could actually do that given America, it wouldn't have mattered because that what Americans wanted to hear, even if you never wanted to do that in the first place.

God I hate that Greenday is correct.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of democrats could have won this election. Ultimately the big mistakes were allowing Biden to run unchallenged, then sticking with Biden until it was too late. Harris then had an impossible task to win.

If the democrats had an actual democratic process, and put their best possible candidate forward they may have won. Instead this election was very much a repeat of 2016 - the wrong candidate, being favoured through to the election by the DNC. In 2016 the DNC closed ranks around Clinton because of fear of Bernie and also because of a crazy notion that it was "her turn". Biden didn't run when he should have. This time Biden ran when he shouldn't have, and other strong candidates in the party didn't get a chance.

But it was more than the candidate - the election focus was totally wrong. 1/3 of the electorate did not vote - and this election is not a story of Trump breaking through. Trump got 74m votes in 2020 and about 74m now. The Dems got 81m votes in 2020 and 71m votes now - Trump is basically static; but the Dems lots 10m votes because they ran a bad campaign. Those missing 10m voters are in the 1/3 who are not included in polls; because Trump has not broken much above his 74m ceiling. The Dems floor fell out under them instead.

The polls always showed 50:50 but that was just "likely voters". Really 1/3 support dems, 1/3 support reps and 1/3 weren't going to vote. That vast pool of people are not all never voters; the missing 10m are in there. THAT is where the Dems should have been going for votes. Forget the republicans; they should have been reaching out to the disinterested and disenfranchised. A positive message that actually addresses their concerns.

The "moderate" Republican votes were never in play nor worth courting, and the abortion and democracy focuses were not the priorities of voters. The dems needed to listen to the actual voters - and the message of what the voters cared about is clear: the economy. The Dems needed to have a clearer message on the economy - "it's doing great" does not tally with voters experiences who are living with high cost of living after inflation. Prices haven't fallen back, they've just stopped rising as fast. The message to voters should have been "we've done some stuff but there is more to do" and offer clear policies are wage growth, housing/rent costs etc. Give the disinterested in particular something to vote for.

So yes, maybe Bernie would have won. But lets not forget he chose to endorse Biden, not run in the democratic party primary. So it's actually his fault too.

Only Dean Philips, Marianne Williamson and Jason Palmer actually stood up and challenged Biden in the primaries, and they were criticised for doing so as if they were the reason Trump would win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, I think anybody who isn't a genocidal zio could've won. The dems chose genocide over "winning". That's liberalism.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So instead the voters chose genocide + a whole lot more bad stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Oh my god shut the fuck up, that was 8 fucking years ago.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I've been saying that since the DNC muscled him out in 2015. Stupid establishment Republicrats.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The Dems have been putting workers first under Biden the whole time. Putting workers first more than any administration in decades. You guys just believe a bunch of bad press.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He literally broke up a union strike.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

You mean the railroad workers? Did you stick around to listen to the end of the story? Where scant weeks afterward, his administration negotiated a contract for the workers that gave them more paid sick days than they were asking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

They can do better. The biggest issue was messaging though. They talked about how much better the economy is now, which is true if you're talking about stock value but the average American wasn't necessarily doing better, and often doing worse. They kept telling the working class they should be happy instead of focusing on how they recognize the issues and focusing on addressing them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I love Bernie, but he would not have won. He's not healthy enough to have run a national campaign like that, not after his heart event in 2019.

load more comments
view more: next ›