GandalftheBlack

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nothing personnel

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A jumper is a bad example, because it's not just made up of sleeves.

A bra is a much better example. But I was never making an argument that all things made up of two parts are referred to as a pair, just my thoughts on the rationale behind cases where we do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'd say it's less of a grammar rule and more about how things made up of two similar parts can be conceptualised

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They're made up of two similar parts which form a pair, unlike a jumper

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not an expert or qualified in any way, but my guess would be it would be fine without the syrup. Maybe a little bit more butter and milk could make up for the missing syrup in terms of texture. I imagine the sugar in the syrup helps the yeast along more, so maybe to compensate you could let the dough rise for longer?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

That was my first thought exactly

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

It was also laminated

 
view more: next ›