Greyfoxsolid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's more annoying? That people have the ability to generate content with AI, or that everyone on lemmy constantly complains about it?

You're banging your heads against walls over and over. Stop. Shut up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (13 children)

People complain about AI possibly being unreliable, then actively root for things that are designed to make them unreliable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I read the entire comment and the key word was "anything", which as you just admitted was in fact hyperbole. As I said it was.

It's actually not overkill, because the way it responds (even for simple requests) can be tailored to help you understand things better. I've thrown everything at from simple stuff to complex stuff, and it does a really good job 90% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

LLMs are an implementation on the way to AGI.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I just know where the future is headed. Gotta be realistic about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They are making investments in green energy for their data center usage.

Our current economic model is insufficient to handle advancement in technology.

I have never had issues finding out information about file formats, or finding conversion tools for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The AI is not the problem in this case. The economic model is. It is not an economic model suitable for the advancement of technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't think you've thought it through to it's logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

For example, the US and China are international and ideological competitors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To say you've never gotten a fully correct result on anything has to be hyperbole. These things are tested. We know their hallucination rate, and it's not 100%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I have used them in a large variety of ways, from general knowledge seeking to specific knowledge seeking, writing code, generating audio, images, and video. I use it most days, if not essentially every day. What examples would you like me to provide? Tell me and I will provide them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you realize these companies are now making bigger investments into green energy?

This was always going to happen with the advancement of technology. It's inevitable so long as humanity survives long enough.

Like what?

 

I've tried a lot of the launchers I see talked about frequently- Nova, Niagra, Smart Launcher, Action Launcher, etc. but they all seem to not be worth the hassle of switching away from pixel launcher. Also none of them have the Google News feed that the pixel launcher has. I feel like I'm losing features when I switch. Perhaps I'm just stupid and am not utilizing the features these launchers actually bring to the table.

Can you tell me about your favorite launcher and it's features that keep you hooked to it? Thanks.

 
 

For anyone who knows.

Basically, it seems to me like the technology in mobile GPUs is crazier than desktop/laptop GPUs. Desktop GPUs obviously can do things better graphically, but not by enough that it seems to need to be 100x bigger than a mobile GPU. And top end mobile GPUs actually perform quite admirably when it comes to graphics and power.

So, considering that, why are desktop GPUs so huge and power hungry in comparison to mobile GPUs?

 

So a bunch of people in this subreddit told me that uTorrent was trash and to switch to QBitTorrent.

I didn't think much of it. How could one be so much better than the other? They're both just torrent downloaders.

Holy shit was I wrong. I don't even really understand what is happening, but downloading torrents on QBitTorrent is so, so, so much faster and I don't even understand how.

A movie downloads in basically seconds compared to 10 or 20 minutes on uTorrent.

Why is this? What is this magic? What makes QBitTorrent so much faster?

 

The fastest option is 30 minutes intervals. Can you please add 5 minute intervals? 30 minutes is a long time.

 

A lot of my files were shitty 480p versions of movies from the Napster days. Now they're all 1080p, with a few 720p exceptions (mainly tv series episodes). All in all 500 something files in total. Now just watching uTorrent slowly download them all. Hopefully my VPN keeps the eyes off of me...

view more: next ›