LibertyLizard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago

This is a classic mistake partisans of all types make. The supporters of our enemies are not a monolith. Sure, most will react negatively but some will like these ideas.

A lot of republicans support the party because they mistakenly think Trump and his allies are fighting against some evil cabal that controls society to make their lives miserable. These policies can help break through that misinformation, if it is shared through avenues that reach people. Fox News, for all its flaws, is one such place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

For the record, he’s a democratic socialist, not a social democrat. These are distinct, though related movements. The difference between them, which you seem confused about, is that socialists do not uphold the capitalist class, despite your claims. Social democrats want to retain capitalism, while democratic socialists do not.

However, democratic socialists do have differences of opinion with more radical socialists on the best way to achieve the socialized means of production they aim for. They favor reform over revolution.

You are welcome to disagree with this view but it’s not a good reason to view their socialism as false or insincere.

No need to reply, since we already established that you’re not interested in good faith discourse. But I couldn’t leave this misinformation unchallenged.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

PTB. Not sure what is false or misleading about the fact that many European politicians support the Israeli occupation, or that some do criminalize pro-Palestinian political action.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I know what socialism means. I wanted to hear your interpretation of the facts regarding Mamdani, since this is a contentious topic, and socialism is a broad tradition. But I see now it was a waste of time to expect serious discourse from you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I guess that’s a yes. I was genuinely curious to hear the case that he’s not a socialist but it doesn’t seem you have much basis for this opinion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I’m talking about Mamdani specifically though. Or are you just assuming that based on your feelings about the US in general?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (9 children)

He calls himself one, do you have cause to doubt it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The concept of citizenship itself is flawed beyond redemption.

But I agree with the broader point. States should do whatever they can to protect their residents from fascist violence.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago

We all knew who Cuomo was. His backers have no one to blame but themselves for thinking so little of voters that they would simply forget his many scandals.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Tankies have redefined a wide variety of words in ways that are completely unrecognizable to other speakers of their languages. Empire and imperialism are prominent examples. So I suspect, if you understood the way he’s using the word, the statement would be accurate. But of course, one also needs to acknowledge that their definitions are carefully crafted for political ends, including the deception of unsuspecting people.

On the other hand, if you aren’t at least vaguely familiar with what they’re talking about, it can also make them appear to be complete lunatics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but I think it undermines democrats who have been willing to go to bat for Mamdani like Jerry Nadler and Chris Van Hollen.

I’d like to see as much praise for these people as we see condemnation of people like Gillibrand. The democrats are genuinely split here and it would be valuable to see the correct side come out on top.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Haha no worries.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/19339040

Not a local but sharing the word since this is highly needed.

 

Not a local but sharing the word since this is highly needed.

71
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Boycotts traditionally require a lot of coordination to make them work. They require:

  • a target (who is supposed to change behavior)
  • a demand (so the target knows what they have to do to get the boycott to stop)
  • boycotters (a lot of people who used to be customers refusing to be customers anymore)
  • leadership/negotiation committee (people who can show the target they’re hurting their bottomline and negotiate over demands)
  • a way to communicate with the boycotters (a structure and massive social reach!).
1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Trump has instructed the US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to increase logging targets and for officials to circumvent the US’s Endangered Species Act by using unspecified emergency powers to ignore protections placed upon vulnerable creatures’ habitats.

This move is similar to recent instructions by Trump to use a rarely-used committee to push through fossil fuel projects even if they imperil at-risk species. Experts have said this overriding of the Endangered Species Act is probably illegal.

The order also stipulates logging projects can be sped up if they are for purported wildfire risk reduction, via “thinning” of vegetation that could ignite. Some scientists have said that aggressively felling forests, particularly established, fire-resistant trees, actually increases the risk of fast-moving fires.

“This Trump executive order is the most blatant attempt in American history by a president to hand over federal public lands to the logging industry,” said Chad Hanson, wildfire scientist at the John Muir Project.

“What’s worse, the executive order is built on a lie, as Trump falsely claims that more logging will curb wildfires and protect communities, while the overwhelming weight of evidence shows exactly the opposite.”

 
 

Hope this is on topic enough. Nice job to Angelenos for standing up to these bullies and defending our transit projects.

 
 

Certain trees survived, according to Cal Fire, because they have a natural adaptation to withstand fire, such as thick bark, a shape that sheds embers and higher moisture content than the structures that caught fire. “While trees may still be singed, they are often less flammable than structures,” according to the post.

 

Would like to see this model across the whole world! Local people are the backbone of any truly sustainable conservation plan.

 

Once the epicenter for deadly human-elephant conflict, an eastern Nepal village along the Indian border has transformed into a model of coexistence.

Villagers, once fearful, have adopted elephant-resistant crops and beekeeping, and through a rapid response team, they safely guide elephants away.

Government policies, conservation efforts and shifting community attitudes have significantly reduced fatalities, with no deaths reported in the area since 2015.

While Bahundangi offers a model for coexistence, villages along the migratory routes for elephants have become hotspots for human-elephant encounters, requiring the need for conservation corridors and education to mitigate conflicts.

view more: ‹ prev next ›