Seasm0ke

Nate silver showed he was full of shit in 2016. Idk why anyone still listens to him.

Mastodon for the win!

Ket been catching a lot of strays for this asshole but is this effective horse tranquilizer truly to blame? I answer, Neigh.

Yeah man but it was more the first tea I tried and branched out from there. Still my favorite though

" because I was constipated, you writing a book?"

That was trumps entire campaign strategy. Dems mocked them for their online spend and now look. GamerGate, YouTube ads, Swarmfront and 4Chan have shaped the internet discourse to be right leaning on nearly every popular platform. I hate to admit it but shitposting did created change. The alt right pipeline radicalized young men into trump voters.

Little Bobby tables, we call him

Im sorry man but what do you call it when someone gets zero votes, doesn't even run in the election but sets up his own government and gets every western country to fund him and call him the leader of the country? Thats democracy ? Yall hopeless.

Guaido boycotted the election btw and declared himself the winner with no votes

Lets put it this way, If yahoo admits USAID is leveraging its funding to support a coup, it certainly is. The media all has a bias, whether its ap or BBC or aljazeera. I dont consume any of them uncritically.

The first two statements are describing USAid and the last sentence is a sarcastic remark, indicating taking it down is working in Chinas best interest. Thats how it reads to me.

Oh, you're a neoliberal, that explains a lot. I guess you wont care about any actions that override another countries Democratic process when its funneled through NGOs or provides America a strategic advantage.

Condescending conservatives who are naive enough to take the most milquetoast yahoo news explanation at face value are not going to be worth discussion, because yalls politics actually align with USAids mission plan.