WagnasT

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

here https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1610381114 we can talk about this, feel free to put forward counter arguments, the gist of the cited paper is that previous studies claiming 100% renewable baseload is possible requires sketchy manipulation of the expected demand as well as currently unavailable storage technology on an almost impossible scale. We're working on all kinds of storage solutions but the reality is we're not there yet. I'm rooting for molten salt storage or compressed gas storage rather than ramping up more lithium battery storage. Flow batteries are promising as well, but in any case we won't have enough storage or transmission capability to have a 100% renewable baseload in the next couple of decades.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

like not the onion but it's not bertstrips

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

NG units are usually paid from federal dollars, if NGB says knock it off the top brass at their state JFHQ will comply because most of them don't want to lose federal recognition. There may be a handful of extremists in the ranks but the vast majority of NG members aren't going to be insurrectionists, they just want to get their drill check, if the checks stop coming they will too. Most states are extremely reluctant to pay for state active duty so I bet this goes away once NGB pulls funds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not OP. Only using the cited article, it says the NPP will last 40-80 years and maintenance will be expensive after 40 years but gives no figures, then says solar would last 50 years and be cheaper to maintain but again gives no figures. These statements may be true but without figures this is nothing more than an oversimplified opinion piece. We're not going to have a productive discussion with opinion pieces.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I put the data in excel and make colorful charts to show management that their ideas are possible but expensive. Then do the same to show the cost of not purchasing maintenance equipment is in fact more costly than the necessary equipment.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

most of us that gave up windows did so because it had tons of issues. Don't act like windows is flawless, MS stopped putting in work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i would not infer that 30% was the limit, that's just the reduction after 1 year of donating every 6 weeks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

someone that needs blood has probably lost blood already so it's probably better to not die.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Friendly reminder to donate blood or plasma regularly. We do need to deal with PFAS, but at least you can reduce the accumulation in your body.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i can't believe they could fit that many donuts in a person.

view more: ‹ prev next ›