this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
242 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3669 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration has frozen $175 million in federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its policies allowing trans women to compete in women's sports.

A senior official said this is "just a taste" of further action, with UPenn at risk of losing all federal funding due to a Title IX investigation.

Trump signed an executive order on February 5 banning trans women from women's sports, citing fairness and safety concerns.

Advocacy groups are challenging the move, arguing it discriminates against trans athletes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The real agenda is to bring down higher education in general. The whole Trans athletes thing is a smokescreen. The fascists consider higher education to be a stronghold of woke liberalism. If if weren't trans athletes, it would be some other excuse to make the cuts.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

a bunch of college educated fascists have convinced low education whites that education is evil and they should abhor getting an education when they are perfectly fine doing physical labor.

and totally not because they don't want the poors to get educated and realized how fascist they are.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So universities are about to go 0-2 in the fight against a Trump takeover.

Columbia bent the knee almost immediately. It'll be interesting to see how long UPenn holds out.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just pointing out that UPenn is his alma mater. He went to the Warton School of Business and one of his professors called Trump the dumbest student he ever had.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well that probably explains why he decided to randomly pick on UPenn. He doesn't care about the trans athletes. His fee-fees were hurt.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

The funniest thing is that the Warton School was one of the first Ivies to get serious about computers. Before they had a separate computer department it was all part of Warton School. With his daddy's money Trump could have ended up hiring Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, but that would have required a tiny amount of brain cells

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

They should rescind his degree.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Columbia bent the knee

Why do you think that Columbia was "fighting" trump in the first place. They had been trying to deport and ban criticism of Israel for decades, they finally had the opportunity and they are glad of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I wouldn't really call it bending the knee. Schools offer services to students and while making the statement (that trans people are still people) is important denying services to hundreds if not thousands of students (due to lack of funding) who may or may not agree with that position just to make the statement isn't responsible as an institution.

I absolutely agree with their attempt to stand up for students rights, and I also agree with their turnaround. There's a significant and nonzero chance that they could have hurt students even inadvertently by losing that funding and it was responsible of them to think of the entire student body even though the message is very important.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (17 children)

"First they came for the socialists" yada yada.

It's nice to be privileged so you can ignore the sufferings of others, but eventually it will reach everyone.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Schools offer services to students and while making the statement (that trans people are still people) is important denying services to hundreds if not thousands of students (due to lack of funding) who may or may not agree with that position just to make the statement isn’t responsible as an institution.

I understand your rationale. And in fact, in 99% of circumstances I begrudgingly agree with it. Sometimes, you have to do what's right for the greater good even if you know it might hurt a few people in the process. But this is not one of those times. And it's not even because of the specific issues being raised (Protests at Columbia, trans athletes at UPenn, etc.).

The reason I'm against it is because by so quickly bending the knee for Trump on these issues is that you're telling your students, community, and alumni that the principles you claim to stand for are up for bid. You're in favor of trans rights -- until trans rights start actually costing you money. You're in favor of the rights of students to protest -- until it effects your funding. What happens when a school promotes support of LGBT issues and then comes in the crosshairs of the Trump Hate Machine? "Sorry guys, but we've gotta kick all the gays out. Trump threatened to pull $100 million in funding if we don't."? Where do you draw the line?

It's one thing to expect that of a regular business. Neither your local mom & pop store nor Wal-Mart are expected to be champions of our freedoms and hold such an important place in our society. Even if I strongly disagree with their decisions, I can understand if they follow where the political and financial winds are blowing. But universities are a completely different beast and play a completely different role in our society.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Replace "trans students" with "black students" in your justification and ask yourself if you still believe doing what is good for the majority (not "the entirety") is the most important directive.

This is exactly how fascism works. "First they came for..." and all.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

He’s a useful idiot for many.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not true! He has advisors telling him to do all this stuff. If you recall, his first administration was utterly chaos, and he didn't care about trans people at all. He's got handlers, those are the real people in charge.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Trump is a dictator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Remind me again of how many transgender college students have recently been arrested for having sex with a minor?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

lol UPenn literally does not need anyone's help.

Go ahead you dipshit.

Their endowment could nearly cover tuition for all students in interest alone. (Cost would be 1.9B, interest on their endowment is over 1.1B. not that 800M is chump change but like... They're doing pretty damn fine)

This headline seems to further scare us. UPenn barely feels this. This is theater.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Researchers at these Universities do indeed need the money

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

False. They need grants, which are totally separate from this.

Source: academia.

UPenn is not going to feel this.

At all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (7 children)

People said the same thing about Columbia. Took them days before they bent the knee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No they didn't. Columbia has had ties to Israel since forever.

And UPenn has way more scratch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

UPenn’s endowment is larger (22.3 billion vs Columbia’s 14.8) but I agree with you, UPenn will bend

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Nah, it will, when administration fires a bunch of workers and then gives themselves a raise for accepting the ultimatum.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're going to cave instantly and bend the knee. They may not need it, but they're definitely going to do everything not to lose it, including kowtowing to fascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

this admin hating on trans women and banning them from competing in sports while entirely overlooking trans men on testosterone who, given the legislative focus on transfem people, could still compete in women's sports (theoretically) while on testosterone underscores how fucking little this admin knows about how this actually works scientifically.

after all why wouldn't "women pretending to be men" be taking testosterone and competing and dominating in sports if that's what this is all about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I bet you Trump can't name 10 trans women (hell, make it 5 for easy mode)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I think its a solid question to ask, does trump do anything besides think about other peoples junk?

load more comments
view more: next ›