YungOnions

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You could say it was one of the websites of all time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ask six people to identify the 'soul' in a piece of art and you'll get seven different answers. It's an entirely subjective concept.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as the saying goes. Maybe we should stop gatekeeping what art people enjoy and stop brigading them when they dare to like something 'real artists' decide they shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, makes sense. How any car made post 2020 can justify not having wireless Android Auto or Carplay is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I bought an old 1950s/1960s Armin Trosser hand grinder from ebay a while ago and use it every day. Works great and looks lovely in my opinion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Interesting. Terrible how? Slow?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Is that not missing an 'I'? As in

I travelled both though I be one traveller...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Some things to consider with regards to software like this. If music can be heard, it can be scraped, period. Even if you put up barriers on major streaming platforms or embed “anti-AI” tags, all it takes is:

  • Someone recording the audio with a mic (analog loophole)

  • A downloader that bypasses the protection (e.g., YouTube-dl)

  • A source that doesn’t respect the protections (pirate sites, leaks, live audience recordings)

If a human can access it, an AI can be trained on it, even secondhand, and unlike traditional use cases where clean, labeled data is critical, AI models can learn from messy or partial data. Even if you degrade the quality or watermark it, a model can still extract style, rhythm, melody and timbre, just like how humans can recognize a song through static.

Also, you can’t control every upload, every sample, every remix, every bootleg. As soon as someone puts your protected content in a place without safeguards, it’s back in the 'training pool'.

Even if AI models never directly train on your content, they can still learn your style by training on other artists influenced by you, or on users uploading “in the style of” recreations. Protection doesn’t stop style emulation which is what many people want from AI anyway.

Finally just because AI avoids your data doesn’t mean it avoids imitating you. You may block scrapers, but unless copyright law adapts to handle stylistic theft, there’s no real recourse when AI replicates your sound or vibe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Tiny Glade vibes!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Have you seen the new INSTER? It shares some of the same design language as the IONIQ.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Agreed. The first gen IONIQ 5 is a amazing looking car, although I'm less keen on the new 2025 revision.

 

For a few days now if I use my sh.itjust.works profile comments are slow to load and often posts timeout and refuse to load at all. I even tried posting this question using my sh.itjust.works profile and it wouldn't post at all. Is there something up with their servers or something?

view more: next ›