this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
452 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23100 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah, taking the Russian approach, I see

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago

Yep:

"Reduced transparency in official statistics is perhaps the most troubling aspect of disbanding FESAC," wrote Claudia Sahm, a former Federal Reserve economist, at Bloomberg on March 11. "Cutting off agency staff from external advisers creates an environment where political interference could occur much more easily—and go undetected. With political officials such as Lutnick arguing publicly that GDP should exclude government spending, it is especially important to have external, independent experts."

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Welp...

If you don't test for recession, there can't be any recession, right...???

🙄 🙄 🤡 🤡

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

If you didn't catch me cheating I didn’t cheat.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Do they think we won't realize it when people can't get a job, and prices are going sky high?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They do. Because they already got away with making the US fail to realize a whole bunch. About project 2025. About Trump. School shootings. Class solidarity. Etc. The US is pliable because 50% of the country just needs someone on Fox to tell them how okay it is for them to get fucked, and they'll just let it happen.

Problem is, there are clear limits on how far this can be pushed. And these idiots are just about to discover what those limits are. But they are without question idiots, and certainly stupid enough to not see how this is going to effect them.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When people can't to feed themselves, that's when the riots will start. I'm not looking forward to it, but it looks like they're going for a complete system breakdown.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm not so sure. Republicans do have a persecution fetish, but that's specifically tuned not to apply to Republican leaders. Instead, the anger will be pointed at minorities. Many will take the bait because it's what they do as a bloc every single time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, a few days without food and people will storm the White house. There isnt a country in the world that will literally starve to death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It'll turn nasty long before then, when they're told (again) that it's all the fault of those 'immigunts' who are taking their jobs and eating their food.

Once that bloodbath starts, few of those involved will think to change target, and most of those who aren't will be hunkering down, waiting for it to blow over.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I agree with others below that the GOP is at the limit of what they can get their followers to believe in once they can't eat. Most are already suffering, and expect a quick turn around. Instead, we're about to get Great Depression 2: Trumps BS Boogaloo. The violence that follows will overwhelmingly be directed at those that control every branch of the government with an iron grip and failed to make anything better despite it. Historically, this has always been the course of events.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

But they are without question idiots

That's what I've been saying all along.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Controlling information has always, and will continue to work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

you and many educate dpeople would know. its to keep thier supporters stupid and ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We’ve been in a recession. The word you’re looking for now is depression.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really, maybe a blip of something in 2021-2022, but generally the US economy as a whole has been doing alright - Real GDP. Individual people though have been getting beaten up recently, but boy is that about to get worse.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait... I thought Trump was going to have inflation and grocery prices fixed on day 1

I know it's been said, but it bears repeating, for the willfully ignorant in the back

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He said he was being sarcastic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was about the Ukrainian peace deal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, I'm having trouble keeping track.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Honestly, that's kind of the point. Shovel 20 horrific things into the pipe, you notice one, 19 horrific things slide past.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Housing market crash when?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

when even weathier than average citizens can't afford it, then billionaires can buy up everything for chump change and squeeze that money back out of the populace with absurd rent that nobody will even try to undercut. especially now that anyone with one or more brain cell knows this whole idea of 'checks and balances' only applies to the poor

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And once people have nothing left to lose and their families are starving they drag the rich into the streets and beat them to death with asphalt torn from the roads. History has repeated this scenario over and over again.

As of 2023 there are 735 billionaires in the US, and 340,000,000 non-billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why hasn't this happened in Russia?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably never. Land is a very finite resource violently controlled by a smaller and smaller group of people. There's no reason for them to dump their holdings. People literally need land to survive. It's the ultimate and original capitalist cash cow. It's a fundamental pyramid scheme on human needs along with food, water, air, etc. That's a very solid foundation in a fascist police state.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

They are already doing it. Look at the illegal immigration numbers, which they released with no documentation for either Biden's ludicrously high numbers to Hitlerapig's ludicrously low numbers.

HitlerPig wouldn't release a single number for anything without sweetening it in his favor.

Everything from this administration should be assumed to be a blatant lie.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I guess he will hang up curtains in the market aisles, so that people don't know that they are bare at a glance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

We know....we all sadly knew it all along.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Just do what Biden did and redefine what a recession is to make it look less gloomy

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do what you do and redefine reality to fit your propaganda model.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, actually it was Obama that redefined recession. Biden redefined unemployment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

This is like pointing out grammatical errors in the Titanic's breakfast menu.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Don’t know why you’re getting down voted. This is EXACTLY what Biden did.

Just shows people cannot handle the truth so they down vote instead. Smh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I posted elsewhere, but I think the real issue is that it really didn't look like a recession. While technically it was a recession by the two negative quarters definition, if you look at real GDP it's barely a blip.

I suspect at the time the concern was that calling it a recession would have impacted the recovery. Not that I think that's a good excuse, but they werent hiding the data. With Trump, he's trying to hide the downturn rather than trying to rally the recovery.

Calling out Biden here is a very "both sides" centrist kinda mindset.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The circled area is the blip that your source is referring to. The giant drop before it is from during Trump's first term. Everyone thought we were going to hit a recessesion that would be a big issue. As you can see it was fixed extremely quickly. The wall street journal leans right and was using it as propaganda to promote Republican efforts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for adding the additional context!

What's funny is the covid drop isn't even that bad either compared to some other recession. So the 2022 blip is really inconsequential.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah really our productivity in those terms just dropped to 2016 levels.

Now if you compare to Argentina's struggles. People can see why there were so many people trying to get out of there. They weren't criminals being sent out of their prisons, they were people fleeing a giant recession that left them starving.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's the BlueMAGA cult mindset

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's odd that people here mock voters for "pRiCe oF EgGs" but don't realize that it was shorthand for the economy being shit for the vast majority of Americans. Obviously Trump isn't better for the economy, but there were fundamental problems like the high cost of living that people were desperate to get out of and desperate people do desperate things which can be seen as stupid.

Our economy has been an inflatable castle patched with band-aids all over, especially since 2008, but the foundations for this setup was laid down decades before that. Touting higher consumer spending numbers (because people have to pay more for everything), lower unemployment (because people are kicked off unemployment and have to work shitty gig work), or the dumb stock market (which has been pumped with massive money printing) is as dishonest as outright hiding numbers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

But Harris told me the economy was doing great as my family had to balance eating food, paying rent, and getting my dad's medical bills for having a stroke. She'd never lie!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›