I think we and literally the entirety of the climatologist field needs to see some sources on how animals that take away sequestered carbon somehow sequester carbon themselves.
finderscult
joined 6 months ago
A) they don't double dip on the marketplace, developers (or publishers) get the steam tax on all items sold there.
B) maybe, but they provide unlimited nonrate capped downloads for eternity for your game, including free unlimited downloads and uploads of workshop items. Bandwidth isn't cheap at scale, you could spend >50% of your income as a small dev on distribution, or for 30% you get everything steam provides for eternity for all your players.
Incorrect, steam allows for lower prices and give aways if steam keys you request... As long as it's not the base price. That's how humble bundle works. That's how every dev give away works.
The "devs" in this case want to sell access to the steam version of their game for lower than the steam price, on a permanent basis. Which is against steams rules, because steam provides a service that needs to be paid for, one that is worth far more than the 30% cut.
Eliminate rent, not people.
He did neither, the president does not have those capabilities.
Stardew valley exists outside of colonialism, meaning coffee costs more as the native farmers actually get paid a reasonable amount.
Ah yes, the great and powerful American nuclear lobby... That hasn't sold a new reactor in 30 years.
Most people support nuclear because it's the best base load generation method, and that can't be replaced by renewables.
You're literally less than a degree of separation from the "nuclear is a Chinese psyop" people.
Expeditions are what you're looking for, for the most part. There's also at least two main story lines now. But yeah there needs to be more
Sure, so can spending money, drinking water, or eating anything.
The grownups appear to be fantasizing about killing other people because they're too lazy or too stupid to deal with their domestic threats like cost of living, opiod proliferation, the permanent loss of many hundreds of thousands of housing units to investment property management groups, and the upcoming trade war with the US and apparently China if the right wing gets more power at the Federal level.
That definitely seems more important than fixing your cost of living crisis or dealing with the two provinces now that are actively rolling back human rights advances.
I guarantee pretty much no one that downvoted it did read it. It's not the type of analysis I'd agree with as it seems to suggest dems ever wanted to win; but it's very well written, it correctly identifies behaviors that should be concerning to any voter, it doesn't really offend liberal sensibilities, and really only lacks a more in depth analysis of how voters picked up on this without apparently realizing it.