hypelightfly

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Huffman is awesome and does a lot for his district.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's not fake, it's literally still up on the site. You're fucking disgusting.

https://rqd2.net/post/2199

https://web.archive.org/web/20230905022257/https://rqd2.net/post/2199

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

It's a public Mormon school.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

The way things ended tarnish all the good shit did. That's what she'll be rightfully remembered for.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sinema didn't switch parties. Switching parties would require joining the Republican party for it to matter in the Senate. Sinema switched to independent (no party) and is still caucusing with the Democratic party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Yes, but you'll get defenders who believed the asshole union rep that was against the strike in the first place saying he came through.

He didn't. They didn't get what they wanted, they got terms that had already been rejected by the majority and many of them still don't have sick days despite the misleading headlines saying otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What could someone say, what evidence could they give, to convince you that your assumption of the left as the problem in American electoral outcomes, is incorrect?

You could have read their comment before asking a BS leading question about something they never said in the first place. Why would you expect anyone to engage with your bad faith assumptions?

In any first past the post election anything more than 2 candidates means there is a spoiler.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

My phone literally doesn't ring unless it's a known contact. I don't even see the call coming in to answer if I wanted to.

Everyone else can leave a message and get a call back if it's something I care about.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

The ads aren't the problem. The chosen ad network that invades your privacy is.

The problem doesn't go away by paying for it. The developer is still using the privacy invading ad network for everyone who doesn't pay. They have the option to not use that ad network but that would result in less ad revenue.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Showing ads = exploiting and abusing your users.

Correct, well almost correct. It's not showing ads that's the problem. It's the tracking needed to show targeted ads.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why would you support (buy) software that does something you believe is wrong?

The developer chose to put in ads and use Google's ad network. That was not a requirement, it was a choice.

view more: ‹ prev next ›