Not only were the programmers women, but so were the computers.
linuxPIPEpower
this place isn't what it used to be
the above comment was written by a person who's lack of understanding of consent suggests they are almost certainly guilty of sex crimes.
why not just add the options to it?
If you are asking me, personally, it's because making any contributions to ls
is far beyond my capacities and will remain that way for the forseeable future.
Personal deficiencies aside, would it even be a good idea to modify ls
in this way? It seems to me that stability and predictability is a feature, not a bug. Basically you know how ls
will work on every linux system. Adding all these features would turn it into something else and potentially introduce chaos. ls
is tested on >millions of systems in every context; a known quantity. A feature set which is limited to the necessities avoids introducing bugs, flaws, security issues etc.
And once added, a feature probably shouldn't be removed. In 2024 I love having git
status optionally integrated into my ls
-type tool. But in 2034 will git
still be as ubiquitous? What about 2054? ls
is for the ages. eza
is for right now.
I guess it would be too much to get a set of metronomes eh.
oh cool! I didn't have too much confidence. Some websites manage to defeat it.
make sure to tell all your friends how they can back up their text books. :D
whatever gets em there
It's written in a messy way but I actually read it the opposite way.
There is a non insignificant portion of the gun community who, when presented with the concept of “everybody should be taught gun safety, because it’s a right granted to us” relating specifically to liberals (go figure) happen to get really fucking antsy at the thought of people they don’t like owning guns.
I think what @[email protected] meant was that the 2A people don't seem to be very interested in defending gun rights for people outside their circles. I don't know if I'd use liberals as the example here. I think Black people would be far more salient.
Did the NRA Support a 1967 'Open Carry' Ban in California? | Snopes.com
While 1967 was a long time ago, the "antsiness" has remained. How often do you hear of these people doing anything to defend the people who are the primary targets of anti gun laws? Which is, by a large margin, Black and other racialized people.
I heard an interview with some Public Defenders who had submitted an amicus brief in relation to a guns rights case on the basis that even though the actual case was stupid, changing the law would materially improve the lives of overincarcerted communities. I thought it was on 5-4 podcast in follow up to the first ep that covered the case in a less friendly way: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. I don't find the subsequent ep where they had the PDs on for an interview.. maybe it was taken down.
Some websites will fall back to a "simple" version when the javascript they prefer isn't allowed. it's good design. My guess is that these parasites will design their website without such accessibility principals and prevent you from using it except on their terms. But it's worth a shot.
anything that is on your computer, you must be able to save.
- Does Ctrl-S (File > Save) work? (unlikely). Can you select all and copy/paste?
- Try the browser extension SingleFile https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile
- Since you already have your "license", find a PDF backup online. https://annas-archive.org, PDFdrive.com, libgen (websearch for current URL), sci-hub (same), archive.org (need DeDRM from github to download adobe ebooks permenently)
- as someone else suggested, ask some pirates: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/
- Maybe it would be easier to remove the email address from the background. How to do that depends on what sort of fuckery is going on in the PDF and how nerdy you are. Can you open it in any editing software?
By showing how you drew a comic about it them posted it to lemmy ofc