Am I crazy about Stalking Yeti? Wouldn't the opposing creature only die after the entire ability has resolved and state based actions are checked when a player gains priority again?
Wouldn't the order only (really) matter if the Yeti had something like infect, where it dealing damage could reduce the damage the opposing creature deals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI3tsmFsrOg
There are beneficial bacteriophages for humans and other animals and plants.
They claim to be a public benefit corporation, so while they obviously need to get income to run servers and fund development, their objective as a company isn't just to maximize shareholder value.
I don't know where/how to find their actual foundation documents to see what those actually say for their balance of profit vs mission.
I am also wondering who is going to actually handle ranking the tens of thousands of existing cards(gatherer says 28712 legal in commander at this moment), plus hundreds more from each set as they release. Might need to be crowdsourced to be done in a reasonable time. Every deckbuilding website is also going to want to implement that info in their database.
I get the idea, but I don't see how that works effectively in practice. There are a lot of cards that are not good on their own, and only good in the context of a combo. Does having one of those cards in your deck make it better? No, it probably makes it worse. You need the entire combo for one of those cards to matter.
It works for those 1 off value piece cards like Dockside, Tomb, Sol Ring, etc. But multi card combos is where I think it will fail(or at least over score a deck that doesn't include a full combo).
You probably do buy Nestle under different names, they own a lot of stuff