meowgenau

If you're not fascinated by computers and you're not sure if you want to really dedicate your career to it, I'd really think twice about going into CS. If you want to get into programming/development, you can either do that by learning specific languages and building stuff, or study something technical that interests you.

Nowadays, programming is very much required in any STEM related fields if you want to keep up with the times. I myself have an Aerospace Master's degree but have been mostly doing software related things in my career and am now a data engineer at an aircraft manufacturer. None of my data science colleagues studied CS, neither did the data engineers that I work with.

Just one perspective. Don't give up, you've got this!

Markets should be free, trade should be open, industries should be monopolized and the masses should be exploited.

ftfy

Here in Germany the far right is painting him as a commie :)

In the end, we're just training some non-artifical intelligence.

Been running it for years and I'm still using Gmail and Maps. No issues. There's lots of info surrounding the topic of using Play Services etc on GrapheneOS.

Oh wow, didn't know that. Where's this text from?

The time to fight is now.

Another one of those Schrödinger's jokes.

*Technically* they were engineered from the ground up to send a small projectile as far as possible using a chemical reaction.

I'm referring to this bit: they are not technically engineered to simply shoot a projectile. They are engineered for a specific purpose, which is to kill people. Your comment sounds like you want to downplay the role of requirements in the engineering process, like a lot of people here do.

You don't know the first thing about requirements engineering. Technically, these assault rifles are primarily designed to kill/injure people, it's 100% part of the stakeholder/requirements analysis in their systems engineering workflow.

An airliner is not designed to fly through the air. It's designed to transport people and cargo from A to B within a given amount of time. Flying is just a means to achieve it.

There's no shortage of resources available from feminists, trans advocates and medical professionals online

If they're so abundant and easy to find, then why not simply share them? You can also link the other posts that explain your position.

confidently spread their harmful ignorance

If he has such an uninformed position, it should be very easy to defend against it instead of wasting everyone's time by making ad hominem attacks? Maybe we can make the internet a better place by not spewing toxic abuse even if one feels attacked by an opinion, no matter how uninformed it is?

You are defending your ideology in the worst way possible, and believe me when I say this, but you will never convince anyone beyond your closed bubble of why we need to move forward as a society this way.

How about you try to enlighten him then, instead of throwing verbal abuse at him. He stated his opinion and you are free to debate him on that.

The fact that he gets attacked like this for his opinion is why I don't engage in these discussions. Your kind of reaction will lose all support for your cause.