shades

Shoulda put a Trojan on that trojan.

The heavy subsidy by the Chinese government is the reason they would dominate though.

¡Waaaah bad mon China letting people get around with cars and public transit!

/s

"Cool. I think he should piss on the 3rd rail."

¿What the hell? It's right there in the title, letting users OPT INTO IT as in not in the company's discretion forced upon everyone but allowing the user to set their tolerance levels. As long as it can be set to 0 why's this a bad thing?

Forcing moderation ONTO everyone is vehemently opposed.

¿Why the fuck would anyone want to prevent an AI from filtering out nazi/csam from their own feeds?

He's thought of a clever way to offload the responsibility/burden of the platform/service allowing speech on it. It allows people who don't want to see triggering content to not see it, without having to involve some third party that gets PTSD from filtering out all the vile shit humanity has to offer.

Odds are they will do it anyway because ¿how the fuck is the state going to prove otherwise?

. Mozilla could sell itself to some greasy investor and go full steam ahead on enshittification e.g embed ads in the browser, sell user browsing data, connect it to their own services, and so on.

Yeah but you can always fork it from the last push before that happened and then only tools will go with the enshitified version.

¡Think of the society that would crumble if everyone that was an impoverished wage slave ended their life! If even so much as a third to a fifth of the world's population did it, everything would be ripping apart at the seams pretty quick.

*Aliboobie

There is absolutely no excuse for this u/Remember_the_tooth. This is wildly inappropriate and completely out of date. There is absolutely NO excuse generative AI and MLL can't remake this for a sequel using actual Kekius and Trumpf for the modern times.

Kneejerk answers of “all women trust me” are a red flag.

“All women trust me, to be a douchebag”

Certainly there must be a middle ground.

How about instead of, “all women trust me” we pick from, “I would definitely have sex with that man” vs “I would never have sex with that man”

/s

How would you even answer that? Guess?

I would imagine, one lies about it. Maybe instead of relying on the persons desire to be said security position, they can proclaim, “maybe me” with links to their decade long social media presence vetting their incellyness. Where other users can now input their opinion on whether they feel said individual would behave appropriately to an agreed upon code of conduct vs the possibility of them going rogue. Shouldn’t even consider anyone who can’t sign anything with a verifiable key.

¡Not It!

¡¡¡NOOOOOOOOO!!!!

o/`

Yep in my Swastee, yup in my Swastee

I slang in my Swastee, I bang in my Swastee

All in the club spittin game in my Swastee

Whoever that you might see, I know they got a Swastee

Homeboy, brother, sister, mother, daddy or your wifey

Kan Ye's be the name of my Swastee

Hispanic, nazi, niggas even yangs wearing Swastee

Hit the club deep and we all got a Swastee

A throwback, no gat, hell naw that don't excite me

You don't need no throwback cause you will be set on your Swastee

You can get a circle or a v neck on your Swastee

o/`