thepaperpilot

I think they mean in the sense that it's not a native desktop app (or mobile)

Considering the reasons for shutting down, specifically that it took too many resources to keep out bad actors and keep the site as safe as possible, I don't think making it open source is a good idea.

I'm in TX with a whole bunch of constituents amendments on the ballot. Never too optimistic about making a difference in such a conservative state, and particularly annoyed the only thing that could have a positive effect on our failing electric grid is a tax incentive for natural gas 🤮.

The only prop I'm still on the fence about is the university fund. I'm skeptical of state funding for universities, because my understanding is quite a bit of that goes to admin instead of lowering tuition. But most organizations seem to support the proposition, and the only ones who oppose it say they do so because the universities are too "woke". I don't want to vote in alignment with some alt right organizations :/

All contributions being from monthly contributions is a very interesting note. They are what will allow you to reliably make long term decisions. Glad to see the monthly donations are still covering the expenses, and the runway is getting longer over time.

The bit about "no" not meaning "no" means they're specifically implying meta employees can be sexually assaulted even if they say no. I'm sure it's said in jest, but it's still a fairly offensive comment.

I totally agree. I'm optimistic about technology once we escape capitalism. Under socialism automation and technology make everyone's lives easier. e.g. the classic example of a technology that allows workers to be 2x more productive would mean the workers all keep their jobs and pay, but work half as much under socialism, but under capitalism half lose their job and the rest work just as much for the same pay.

That said, things like sustainability, social responsibility, and the other pieces of the "demoralization campaign" should absolutely be considered. They're important.

I think this article makes reasonable sense. Also that quote from Spez is so disheartening. Glad I'm not on reddit anymore

Really like how active photon development is! I plan on using it as the default frontend on my own lemmy instance, which is just waiting on SSO support (no timeline for that unfortunately, and I don't know any rust to help)

Imagine looking at a video where he explicitly states leftists have no desire to rule by violence, and repeating the tired comment that he's a tankie.

Well funnily enough I think that part, legally, is totally fine. There's nothing anti competitive about being in two unrelated industries, and I don't think there's a good case that aws is a monopoly. There are viable and cheaper alternatives like hetzner, aws is just popular but it's not manipulating the market

That's a really interesting article on how Amazon makes it money when prime is such a good deal for the consumers. I really hope Amazon gets broken up

I'm not sure I understand the overall goal of this project. If it's only serving a single user, why put it online in the first place? It sounds like what they're specifically trying to offer via kitten and domain is a portfolio site, but it feels like they're hiding that fact behind a lot of language about how they're taking a stand against the "big web". I'm obviously all for federated services over centralized ones, but this just seems to wear loftier goals than what it's actually capable of. And if it is a portfolio site, then they should have spent a lot more time talking about discoverability, the obvious issue with small independent portfolio sites whose inherent goal is to get seen by others.