totallynotsocsa

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I really thought this was going to be about gamergate and I was ready to just burn down the entire Internet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

And they inevitably turn every service into an ad delivery service. Thus, enshitification. Subscription services directly convert the utility of the application into revenue. It will always make a better platform, but it might not scale as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I'm sorry but if you are an lgbt republican then you are among the stupidest people to have ever lived.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

This is both incredibly stupid and just an ad for Credit Karma

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The problem with all of these devices is that there is a lot of noise power in the world. A jet engine is loud because the acoustic energy it produces displaces large volumes of air very quickly. To cancel that energy, you also have to move huge volumes of air. Headphones are good at this, in part, because they attenuate so much energy in the first place with an over ear headphone, or well sealing IEM, and place the speaker very close to your ear. A source of acoustic energy which is D meters from your ear has to produce at least D^3 more joules than a speaker right next to your ear, to cancel the same amount of noise. It's possible, kind of, with very big speakers, but a handheld device just won't cut it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's pretty obvious that reddit has never really spent much money on engineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This has been exactly my experience as well, and why I am increasingly comfortable with skepticism of unqualified conservative voices as a default.

I have been having good faith debates over real policy with conservatives for three decades. Since Carter more or less. I know what that debate looks like. But since 2016, I know two types of former conservative - the reformed, who were awakened to the monstrosity that Trump created. And those who openly embraced fascism like a parasite embraces dog shit.

Every person. Every single one so far, who has been equivocal on this topic has turned out to be quietly the latter. The ones belonging to the former group are very open about feeling dumb and misled, even victimized. They express loudly and often the nature of their reform to anyone who will listen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That's fine, but then there is a burden to both understand why your adjacency to this evil force makes people uncomfortable, and to rhetorically separate yourself from it as needed. This is just the unfortunate reality of how deranged mainstream conservatism has become.

I consider myself pretty libertarian in the grand scheme of things, but I am fine with an echo chamber where basic human rights are respected. I believe that my vision of society has no place for bigots or theocrats and that such people should be treated legally the same as fraudsters or thieves. And I think it's absolutely insane that this would be considered controversial in a good faith conservative circle. The real conservatives I know would understand that an inclusive, well represented society is a productive and ideologically secure society.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Conservatives I can deal with, but modern right wingers have lost their goddamn minds.

And the entire issue is that a lot of people who view themselves as moderate conservatives are enabling this ideological brain rot by not vocally disassociating it with more reasonable conservative positions. Because of that, I am way more comfortable saying that conservative voices should be viewed with suspicion than I used to be.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (8 children)

XMPP is very underappreciated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's because conservatism is fundamentally reactionary. They don't seem to be professing any particular ideology because they aren't. They never have. It's always been about opposing the ideology of others.

It's also why it's so insidious. You can't pin down someone who doesn't believe in anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would be very nice if there was a process to reclaim these users at some point.

view more: next ›