this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
566 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45757 readers
3521 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I love that your defense here is: "Look at that, you're just as big of a piece of shit as we are."

But in reality, they're objectively more moral than you are in voting against genocide. That it may happen anyway doesn't change that.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

There are many more issues beyond Gaza. The environment, healthcare, social rights, immigration. They are complicit in all of it.

Yesterday Trump declared "War on Transgender" and his desire to eradicate transgenderism in the US. Musk threw a literal Nazi salute. They immediately put out an EO targeting trans people. Non-voters and 3p voters are complicit in this and in what is about to happen to trans people in the US.

Or course, they don't have the moral stain of a Trump supporter but "not a literal Nazi" shouldn't be the baseline it is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So why should someone care about any of these issues, while you demand them to ignore the issue they care about?

Why do we accept the Democrats pitting transrights against arab childrens right to life?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Because these issues much more directly affect people in the US, and by extension, you (assuming you're even FROM the US)

Personally I'm a trans immigrant. In part BECAUSE of protest voters, my new priority over literally everything else is my own survival. It's not that I don't care about Gaza, my heart breaks for the Palestinians affected by the genocide, but I don't have energy left to devote to that fight. That is by design as a fractured population is less able to work together.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

What you mean by that is they affect you. There are Palestinians in the United States, Jewish people who want to quash the wave of antisemitism this will trigger, and other Americans who would like to not ignite another wave of anti-Americanism is the Arab world.

You don't have to prioritize the anti-war movement over the issues that are closest to your own life and safety, but you don't get to demand that they sideline the issues that are closest to their lives for you. Solidarity goes both ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Actually Harris voters are responsible for all of this because they heard this incompetent and unqualified person fumble through softball interviews saying absolutely nothing at all and looking like a complete fool and they all still voted for her. They all voted for a loser.

She had no policy. Every answer to questions was an evasion.

Blue maga is real.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Voting for more death to protest genocide is a vote FOR GENOCIDE you dumbass

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By not voting, you voted for genocide under Trump. There is no neutrality against fascism, and there is no nonparticipation. You're either against them or you're with them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Genocide under Trump vs. genocide under Biden isn't a big moral difference. Your argument is supposed to be that the other moral issues are critically important, not that the flavor of genocides are important.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"there's zero difference between mostly good with a little bad, and an absolute shitstorm of horrors"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Genocide" as "a little bad" is quite the fucking choice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of genocide, a lot of oppression, a lot of revoking human rights, a lot of political persecution, a lot shifting blame, is quite the fucking choice

And Biden actually pushed for ceasefire and got one. Trump doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And Biden actually pushed for ceasefire and got one.

A naive genocide apologist, what a shock. Israeli commentary on the right is that there's not much reason to still be there as they've pretty much destroyed everything already. The time to push for a ceasefire was this time last year, and then to actually do something to bring it about. And it's not even a real cease fire! They're still killing people! They're a vast distance between the things politicians say and the things that actually happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fascinating how you think I'm the apologist when you at no point have been capable of criticizing Trump for being far worse, not acknowledging your own personal role in ensuring the genocide will get worse by helping Trump win, not acknowledging that those who opposed Trump did so to prevent things from getting worse, and that you then instead of helping prevent things get worse decided to send us spiraling down into a far far worse situation, for literally no other reason than that you're an asshole who thinks the genocide is about you, because why else would you take an action that you claim is to make things "better" by removing a flawed person from power, when you knew all along the replacement would be worse? You're only trying to ensure you didn't support a person who didn't do enough to prevent a genocide - meanwhile that decision actually means you made an active choice to make the genocide worse.

You're only trying to shift blame. You and your crowd are personally responsible for things getting worse and you know it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

His point was that in this specific issue Trump wasn't worse. You're acting like a lame duck president got the ceasefire, but that's frankly delusional. The Knesset knew they were getting trump, Biden didn't achieve anything different. Israel is just doing what it's internal politics directs it to. You're arguing for a distinction on this issue without an actual difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But Trump IS worse

The prior Trump admin's peace deal proposal was giving Israel total control over all of Palestine (full responsibility for physical security), and give them free land in the west bank, with no rights guaranteed to Palestinians

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That is my argument, which you know, which is why you're trying to pretend it isn't. Does this normally work on people or something?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Is it really "voting against genocide" when they voted against all the arms shipment pauses that are now being overturned? They voted against an administration, that administration lost, and now the winner has hit the ground running making the genocide immediately worse. What's "objectively more moral" about increasing arms shipments to genociders?