this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
551 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46888 readers
3650 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States has announced the approval of the sale of more than $7.4bn in bombs, missiles and related equipment to Israel, which has used American-made weapons to devastating effect during the war in Gaza.

The state department has signed off on the sale of $6.75bn in bombs, guidance kits and fuses, in addition to $660m in Hellfire missiles, according to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).

The proposed sale of the bombs “improves Israel’s capability to meet current and future threats, strengthen its homeland defense, and serves as a deterrent to regional threats”, the DSCA said in a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (7 children)

axis of evil and has been. you vote democrat, you vote republican, you vote for genocide. simple as.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

Yeah, because all things are equal. At least to simpletons.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Think the Democrats would build Gaza a Lago?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, they’d just quietly fund the Israeli plan for the same result.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hey they would at least condemned Israel's actions

Excuse me while I go cry in the corner about how fucked we are

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Based on the smirking Vampire Matt Miller, the US would be "concerned" and would be "looking into that"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

It ain’t over, just another chapter in the long struggle for freedom.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Do you know which politician has taken the most money from Israel? I think that he was happy to support their genocide, and his vice president was no different.

Trump is absolutely a nightmare but trying to pretend that Democrats weren't also a nightmare on this issue is ridiculous. The halls of Congress are full of Israeli flags. There is no voting to help. Palestinians meaningfully possible.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

At this point, some people have become walking textbook trolley problems, where to make a choice that makes you moral in one dimension you become a monster in all the others and make everyone worse in the process. But your conscience is safe, thank you for that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it is safe because i didn't allow myself to reduce supporting genocide to a trolley problem.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Reduce? You people spent months reducing all other issues that affect billions of people well into the future like fighting climate change or keeping civil rights or access to healthcare or labour rights or all 900 pages of project 2025 to the one issue where you have ~~no~~ negative leverage either way by voting for president.

You're the one dumbing down political debate to a single issue, I just framed it in a way that captures the pattern of hundreds of sterile debates I've seen online: you can choose to soil your conscience by collectively choosing to avert disaster or let disaster happen and get nothing in return (probably even worse) for your one cause.

And the worst part is your vote should not even have been decisive, it should have been easier to get 10% of undecided normies to compensate your reluctant 1%, but they are depoliticized and don't care if they live in fascism or not anymore.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

and that's my prerogative as a voter. are you here to shame me some more? about the genocide i won't overlook to vote for kamala harris? the same kamala harris who reversed her position on fracking? who wanted to fund nato even harder? you're gonna tell me she represented a positive position on climate change?? and bath-tub of collard green kamala harris is not doing a damn thing for civil rights, so where are you coming from with this?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Eh, I'm venting at this point, as I wrote before, it's not your even your fault, y'all were probably ~~venting~~ grieving too over months of war crimes, it's the uninformed normies who don't care and don't understand that decided this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

This person basically just told you they don't give a shit about anything but one single genocide. Other genocides, like ones in the U.S.? Don't matter. Other genocides in other parts of the world? Don't matter. Climate change potentially killing off the entire species? Don't matter.

Which is why single-issue voters are just abhorrent people.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (4 children)

But you do realize that trump is much much much much worse, right? It’s not just about the genocide, you know.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

To some people the genocide overshadows anything else because... Y'know, it is/was a genocide. Telling those people that "it's not just about the genocide" is, frankly, barking up the wrong tree.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Personally I’d prefer a single genocide over a genocide, all foreign aid being pulled, dumping vital irrigation reserves, and more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That "foreign aid" was literally genocide fuel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

“Yeah we got a genocide but at least we don’t have a genocide!”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And yet they did nothing to stop the genocides of brown and queer people in America happening now.

I guess only one genocide matters. But then that's been clear to the Sudanese for years now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But then that's been clear to the Sudanese for years now.

I mean does America have anything to do with that? Your problem is with the Emirates for supporting that genocide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Yes it does. The fact that you didn't even bother to find out just reinforces what I said. Only one genocide matters to certain people.

https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/the-us-and-the-sudan-conflict-motives-and-ability-to-influence-events/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay this was an interesting and informative read but it does nothing to contradict my point. The article is arguing that America didn't do enough to stop the genocide in Sudan, not that it's in any way directly supporting the RSF.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What are you even talking about now?

This is what I said:

I guess only one genocide matters. But then that’s been clear to the Sudanese for years now.

That has nothing to do with supporting anyone. Exactly the opposite. People who need support are getting none. Because their genocide does not matter to the world. Which is the same thing that will happen when the genocide of queer people in the U.S. reaches that level.

Because queer people don't matter and if they die, it doesn't matter. Even if they're Palestinian. Any Palestinian-American who gets put in a camp for being queer? Who cares when Biden supported the only genocide that's apparently worth caring about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

And I'm saying that the reason people are/were making so much noise amount about the Gaza genocide in relation to the election is because it was funded and protected by America. A genocide happening on the other side of the world and the government actively funding a genocide on the other side of the world are completely different things that call for completely different responses.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i don't think he's much much much much worse, that's too many muchs- maaaybe much much worse- and that's neither here or there.. genocide IS a reasonable red line and you can't gaslight me off my solid footing in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok but you’ve opted for the much much worse ethnic clensing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if it actually happens, much worse than what?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Than what was happening under the dems.

It's already happening. US contractors on the ground, and Trump OKd ramping up in the West Bank which the dems were also blocking

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

which the dems were also blocking

Which the dems were what? Israel ramped up operations in the West Bank during the war if you remember that. Also at least 200 thousand Gazans have died my man at least wait until something (and no, Trump saying horrible things doesn't qualify) happens before you say "worse than what was happening under the dems".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

These people have enough privilege that they know they won't be put in the camps first. And they probably think they never will. So it's no risk to them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Worse how? In terms of for Palestine. They were always screwed no matter what. It seems to me that Trump is pretty much identical to Biden in terms of supporting Palestine, except he's an idiot and says the quiet part out loud while Biden just recited Zionist talking points.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Sometimes you have to choose the lesser evil, and you did good in the difference.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

and sometimes you have a conscience that doesn't allow you to rationalize away complicity in genocide

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You are rationalizing away your complicity in the two genocides that are happening in the U.S. right now. To the point that you've denied that they are happening in the very recent past.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If your choice increases the magnitude of the genocide, how could it reduce your complicity?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

This is down voted for some reason but it's literally true. No matter who you voted for no matter whether you voted or not you voted for genocide in this election. Pure facts.