3DPrinting
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]
There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
view the rest of the comments
~~Haha! You don't need to peep any pixels to see how terrible that camera is.~~
~~I'm just not into Lomo crap. Spend time with a real camera and take good photos. Tinker with your skills as a photographer and not with making toy cameras that you're going to never use again after one roll of film.~~
My bad. I shouldn't have said that.
This project is not for me either, but I will not criticize it nor those that want to build it. You could do that also at no effort or cost to yourself.
Sometimes it's not the end results that matters the most. But rather the journey it took to get there.
You're absolutely right. I shouldn't have said anything. (No sarcasm.)
Just like you're having fun with photographing stuff, others have fun with creating stuff to photograph with. Furthermore, a photo doesn't need to be technically perfect to be good, and different artifacts can create a different feeling in a picture. I have a "perfect" digital camera, as well as an analog one with whacky lenses. For me, the latter is more fun.
I'd suggest getting off your high horse and expanding your horizons.
Yeah, I think you're right. (No sarcasm.) I should keep such opinions to myself. I'm not at all against being a maker for the sake of making, actually. I guess I'm just a camera snob. Calling my criticism "pixel peeping" kinda set me off, and I lashed out, but that's on me. :(
No worries, passions can get the best of us, and we all get enjoyment from different things :)
I have a Canon AE-1 and a Sony a6400, but I use the latter more for practice, especially of long exposures. Unfortunately, the results of the Sony camera don't get close to the satisfaction I get from the Canon ones. The analog pictures are way more often wonky or bad or not perfectly focussed... But they still carry more life in them IMO, with or without editing.