this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
1060 points (100.0% liked)

The Onion

6032 readers
530 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I'm not an expert by any means but haven't the republicans been able to very efficiently stifle democrat majorities before? If they just follow that playbook (delaying things, being pains in the ass, constant insistence on funky rules) they can at least annoy the shit out of them and hopefully slow things down. They're way too polite for that tho, they'd rather just let it happen and hope they come out okay in the end then to risk the wrath of the annoying orange and his minions.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

One thing they could do is stop voting with republicans to confirm Trump's appointees. Have you seen. how well the Republicans obstruct? They can get everybody in their rank and file out on network TV to call for banning a book by title while the democrats can't even get their best faces on TV to call what's happening with NY's mayor blatant quid pro quo corruption

EDIT: Trump energy chief says there are upsides to ecological collapse

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

agreed. that's literally their job. oppose the other party by whatever means at their disposal. use the press, support union actions, so many ideas. be bold be creative.

they at least should stop pretending that "playing by the rules" and "trusting the system" is an appropriate response to illegal orders, illegal firings, violations of constitutional doctrine, and open defiance of judicial and legislative oversight. relevant video from InnuendoStudio, sadly aged like wine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't filibuster cabinet picks or federal judges, meaning the Dems cannot stop Trump appointees, either. The Republicans have 53 senate seats so they can pass whoever they want.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The GOP needs every single person on their side to pass the nominations... Which rarely happen.

Why aren't the dems working whatever GOPers they can to say no? Or is that something only the GOP is allowed to do? Get Dems to defect?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

False, Hegseth is the closest to losing confirmation when 3 GOP voted no, but VP tiebreaker confirmed him anyways.

Hegseth, Vought, Gabbard, Kennedy, and Lutnick all recieved 0 dem votes and passed.

Only 3 Republicans have voted against any confirmation, and Mitch McConnell is the only republican to vote against more than one: he voted against 3.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Mitch McConnell trying to leave a legacy when he was instrumental in creating this fucking mess

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Same with Pence, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it's Trump and "stuff up the deep state" project 2025, there's probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we'll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't believe you're making that argument in good faith. Every one of his nominees have been ridiculous caricatures of stereotypical MAGA car salesman

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

IIRC he had like two or so with good credentials. The one replacing Lina Khan I think was surprisingly good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

There's more appointees than Trump's cabinet, which I agree is bad. There's for example district court judges.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

None of Trump's appointees are good. If they were, they would refuse to serve under him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Appointed federal judges do not have obligations to Trump and may strike down his orders.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sure bud. It's not like they didn't block Biden's stuff and rubber stamped Trump's stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I do not think that is enough reasoning for claiming they're incompetent for blocking their nominations. The Supreme Court has 2 or 3 problem justices, yes, but just look at the plethora of court cases against Trump with injunctions right now. Quite a bit of them were speedily decided under Trump appointees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Please name a single person Trump has picked for a cabinet position that is objectively good.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yep, all they have to do is think…”what would republicans do in this situation?”

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Republicans would get one of their followers to bash Mike Johnson's spouse in the head with a hammer like they did to Pelosi.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Democrats need to pass progressive reform to win. Republicans need to stop progressive reform to win. They're playing different games.

For example, Republicans are gutting Medicaid and Medicare in their new budget proposal and the only thing Dems can do is block the bill which will defund those programs regardless.

Zero win conditions.