this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
103 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9160 readers
3362 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Liberal Party members have chosen former central banker Mark Carney to be their new leader and the next prime minister of Canada.

Carney secured enough votes in the first round of voting to win the job, party president Sachit Mehra announced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

There was never a chance a woman would win as leader. The Liberals claim to be feminist but have never had a female in charge running the Liberal party.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really don't think that had much to do with it.

It should be no surprise that during an economic crisis, the candidate that successfully lead two central banks was selected.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Carney had nothing to do with Canada's economy, it was Jim Flaherty. Carney did major economic damage to England and England was worse off when Carney left. He plans to bring in more taxes if he can't increase current sales taxes plus increase income taxes.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

He plans to bring in more taxes if he can't increase current sales taxes plus increase income taxes.

Not sure where you're getting this from but it goes directly against what he's been saying throughout his campaign.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doing the same job here he had no influence and doing the same job there he ruined everything?

Maybe the UK is worse off because of Brexit, an event which had really only one outcome: worse trade policies, and using less efficient industries to compete against more efficient competitors.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Carney was against Brexit because it was bad economic policy for the UK to follow. They voted for it anyway twice and Carney helped them through it despite him not agreeing with it. The UK is still suffering now and is even talking about re-joining the EU.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that's not really his fault at all, in his position I think it's expected that regardless of the political situation you see it through.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

OMG a Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Bank of Canada had entirely different jobs to do, and different roles. They worked together but had different responsibilities.

He’s going to tax polluting industries. Instead of individuals. If the country elects the Liberals under Carney it’s a mandate to try new things. What those new things are, will be decided by a guy with an education in economics and experience as a policy maker as the Governor of two major global Banks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Under Carney, everything you buy will get more expensive, plus you will have less money with higher taxes. Watch what happens to your money in 3 weeks on April 1st.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Please no. He’s not Trump.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I've set a reminder to revisit this on April 1.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Carney had nothing to do with Canada's economy, it was Jim Flaherty.

Pfft. I was around back then and Flaherty was just Harper's mouthpiece.

And for your information ...

In practice, the (BoC) governor sets monetary policy independently of the government. Source

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Freeland has polled fairly poorly against Poilievre and this is what everyone i know voted on - who can defeat him. Then there's some of the bad takes she made. She sounded austerity-ish, made some anti-woke statements which play right in the cons' hands.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not to mention that she fiercely opposed electoral reform while Mark Carney gave a maybe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The broad Canadian public is against woke policies. People want meritocracy, not identity. Read the public polling of the amount of people who support same sex marriage, it's going down. Look at the polling numbers of the public turning against the ideology of transgenderism.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Please piss off to conservative lemmy’s. Or to the US. You have no coherent explanation of what is “woke” except for maybe it’s something undefined that you don’t personally like. You don’t speak for the broad Canadian public. Stop inflecting garbage US nonsense here. We’ve had gay marriage for more than 25 years and it’s never going away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you go outside, talk with random strangers and ask for their take on woke and check if people out in public support gay marriage. Get people;s opinion's face to face that you don't know previously, the internet is not the real world.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Congrats. You’re my first block on lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

They're a transphobic loser, you won't miss much.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Um, dude? If you're going to pretend to be a Canadian, might be good if you studied up on Canada first.

If instead you're from one of the more disgustingly backward parts of rural Alberta, you might want to pay attention to what's been happening in the rest of the country for the last fifty years or so, with emphasis on the past couple of months.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The broad Canadian public is against woke policies.

Proof please.

Read the public polling of the amount of people who support same sex marriage, it's going down.

... and

Look at the polling numbers of the public turning against the ideology of transgenderism.

Please post the relevant polls.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not unexpected. Those without facts rely only on their feewings.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean it's possible that it may have fallen some due to the relentless campaign against it in thr US, coupled with the typical leakage of American propaganda into Canada. The support for gay marriage was never 100% so it's conceivable that it may have dropped a bit but I don't expect a dramatic change or anything approaching a majority against. Not coming off of 79% approval in 2023.

I really liked how Carney addressed the woke scare. He said that while America engages in a war on woke, Canadians will continue to value inclusiveness. Also he contrasted the US as a melting pot with Canada as a mosaic. Simple.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

A quick look in Wikipedia shows in 2017 support for same sex marriage stood at 74% and in 2023 at 79%. Did it fall since then? To what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The liberals have maintained preferential hiring for women in the public service for decades, even though they are not the minority, nor have they been the minority since the early 2000s. Their policies are often very heavily entrenched in DEI mentalities, with zero tolerance for discussion / debate. Their feminist and minority-centric policies have explicitly alienated a large number of young men, particularly young white men, as was highlighted even during the introduction of the Liberal speeches/presentations on the cbc coverage.

Running a woman for leader is introducing a wedge issue in terms of voter opinion, at a time when the election results are really critical. Pretending like there aren't still a lot of voters who have some degree of sexism is not realistic -- and it's of utmost importance that the Liberals do everything they can to challenge PP. I would rather they ran a man, with a higher chance of winning, than pretended like Freeland could win while she was overtly continuing to alienate male voters right up to the end with the "Man eater" music. Like imagine if a male candidate came out grooving to a song about beating women.... what a stupid, divisive move.

That sort of blindness to the reality of the voting public, is precisely why the NDP are sunk. They run an overtly Sikh guy, who cozies up to Sikh's at every public event he goes to... pretending like this isn't going to alienate a bunch of voters, and be a huge issue in places like Quebec (where they've banned overt religious symbols in the past). It's blind demographic politics optimism, with little serious regard to winning. Same goes for the Greens, when they put in that Black Lesbian Jewish Pro Palestine lawyer lady, who crashed and burned.