this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
303 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9064 readers
1791 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/trump-fentanyl-weapon-of-mass-destruction-executive-order-draft-scoop

Well this is absolutely frightening in so much that Trump is going to force his way into Canada via military operations by claiming fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction.

Anyone remember the Bush Administration and WMDs they said were there but never were?

Elbows up Canuck’s. The time to prepare is most likely closer than we think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

suitcase nukes pretty easy to access for nations that have different friends than US.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

They weren't real and still aren't. You can make a nuke small enough to fit in, say, a shell (and the US did), but the minimum critical mass is still way too heavy to carry around. That's just physics. Uranium and plutonium are both significantly denser than lead.

It's kind of wild you think any nuclear weapon would be "easy to access".

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The minimum critical mass of plutonium is around 20 pounds which is not unreasonable and being denser than lead is actually good since it allows it to be very compact

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

IIRC you have to factor in the explosive lenses and various neutron reflectors as well, and to get all the way to the theoretical minimum you basically need literal tons of that other stuff. Backpack/wheeled luggage/shell weight is what's public, and seems about like about as good as you can get in practice.

There's exotic choices of fission fuel with a smaller critical mass, but they're also aggressively radioactive and tend to really really difficult to produce, to the point of impracticality.

Honestly briefcaseness wasn't the main problem with OP, but it was worth commenting on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)