this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
247 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22634 readers
3742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think the people downvoting you are a little confused. Not only SMS but even direct phone calls can be intercepted and the owner would never be any the wiser, because the network for phones called SS7 and the access points, the "global titles", are so widespread around the globe that anybody and their grandmother can get one, imitate your Sim card's unique identifier "IMSI", and get your calls and texts routed to them. (If they have a spare $10,000 anyways)

This is why many communication options these days advertise that they are encrypted.

[–] vivi@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the people downvoting read the article and saw that the messages were sent from Signal

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The article says they were later added to a Signal group chat. It doesn’t clearly state how the initial messages were sent. So yeah, maybe give it another read and level up that reading comprehension XP while you're at it, instead of casting stones making yourself look silly.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

What initial messages?

  • March 11 - Journalist receives Signal connection request
  • March 13 - He gets added to Signal group. All quotations are from messages in this chat
  • March 15 - He leaves group
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is why many communication options these days advertise that they are encrypted.

Like Signal. You know, the app they were using, as was mentioned in the article, multiple times. You did read the article, right?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I know nothing about Signal, nor do I care to, but thank you for informing me.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The article states they were later invited to a signal group chat. It is not clear from the article how the first messages were sent.

Maybe read the article yourself.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you assuming there were any messages prior to the group chat?

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I think this guy is trying to fight everybody on this thread

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep. And anyone whose been to DEFCON knows a guy who knows a guy with SS7 access.