this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9160 readers
1936 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is grim:

Renters are twice as likely to spend more than 30 per cent of their income on housing than homeowners, according to Statscan data released last year, and the agency has found single-person households broadly to be more likely than other household types to be living in unaffordable or unsuitable housing.

...

The report also found higher rates of “material deprivation” among renters and single-person households. Respondents were identified as materially deprived if they couldn’t afford at least two essentials from a list including unexpected expenses, spending money, small gifts, bills, maintaining a comfortable temperature in their home, transportation and more.

It’s something that’s on Joy Edwards’s mind. The 70-year-old has been living in the same Toronto apartment since the 1980s, when she got divorced. While her rent for a two-bedroom apartment is well below the Toronto average, it eats up 60 per cent of her monthly Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security payments.

Ms. Edwards said she was able to retire by minimizing her expenses and sometimes receiving some food from her church and a local community centre. But with developers expressing interest in her building, she said she worries “all the time” about being asked to leave.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/personal-finance/retirement/article-move-over-millennials-a-third-of-canadas-single-renters-are-seniors/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Well do anything to solve the housing crisis, except build more homes.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

There's a bunch of stuff we could do that would make houses more affordable in addition to building homes. Our governments haven't done those. That includes:

  1. Change tax laws so housing and property isn't an attractive investment.
  2. Bring in a significant number of new immigrants to work in home construction.
  3. Train more people to work in home construction.
  4. Enforce rules around mortgage fraud and income verification.
  5. Enact useful money laundering laws that would prevent real estate from being used to launder money.
  6. Stop housing from being converted into short-term rentals (AirBnb&co).
  7. Discourage short-term rentals.

CMHC&co should be building affordable housing and selling/renting it at below market rates. But it'll take decades for that to have an appreciable effect. In the meantime, there's a bunch of regulatory changes that would make housing more affordable right now - the Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, and other parties are barely talking about any of them (they have mentioned #3).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  1. Allowing cities to build more density and restricting urban sprawl. It may sound counter intuitive to restrict a bit of sprawl and SFH, but when applied properly those restrictions can help encourage upzoning and density in key areas.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The federal Liberals have tied some municipal funding to loosening zoning restrictions (I believe Fredericton is voting on the issue today), and the CPC proposed a similar policy before the election.

It's one of those policies that relies on builders to construct affordable units in a timely manner, so I don't expect it to have a significant impact on the housing crisis. Improving density is good for a bunch of reasons that we undoubtedly agree on, so it's positive overall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

We could just be less weak with our policy and demand builders build a certain % of affordable units on certain plots. We could also start a real government supported affordable unit program. A big part of our housing issues fall on trusting developers to just build what we really need when we know they only build to maximize profits.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)