this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9340 readers
2721 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (6 children)

People always defend MP salaries saying we need it to get a certain level of competence, but purely overpaying doesn't guarantee much.

However time and time again these people do things that wouldnt fly for someone nmaking minimum wage.

Despite how the article is portrayed(91% on the meta polls) all this guy needs to do is stfu and collect 800k.

https://338canada.com/35058e.htm

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

MPs and all politicians should be paid the mean income of the people they represent. That way if they want a pay raise they actually have to work to increase the quality of life for the people who they represent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The problem I have with this is that richer ridings will have richer MPs so people will start treating those ridings like cabinet positions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While true, I think if the population they derive their income from isn't merely of that of their riding, but the average of their region instead (entire city/province, not just the riding), then it will seriously minimize the impact.

But even without that, this would strengthen the vote of low income areas as there will be less competition, making those that represent high income areas worth less since they tend to be outnumbered by low income areas. You either get a high wage, or have an easier time not only getting voted in, but having more peers representing people in similar situations.

Still think spreading the average is better, but overall I think it can work better than it currently is either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Nice points. I appreciate the perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)