this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1289 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2933 readers
846 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Even if all involved data is explicity public domain?

What if it's not public data at all? Like artifical collections of pixels used to train some early upscaling models?

That's what I was getting: some upscaling models are really old, used in standard production tools under the hood, and completely legally licensed. Where do you draw the line between 'bad' and 'good' AI?

Also I don't get the analogy. I'm contributing nothing to big, enshittified models by doing hobbyist work, if anything it poisons them by making public data "inbred" if they want to crawl whatever gets posted.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Even if the data is "ethically sourced," the energy consumption is still fucked.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Total nonsense. ESRGAN was trained on potatoes, tons of research models are. I fintune models on my desktop for nickels of electricity; it never touches a cloud datacenter.

At the high end, if you look past bullshiters like Altman, models are dirt cheap to run and getting cheaper. If Bitnet takes off (and a 2B model was just released days ago), inference energy consumption will be basically free and on-device, like video encoding/decoding is now.

Again, I emphasize, its corporate bullshit giving everything a bad name.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The energy consumption of a single AI exchange is roughly on par with a single Google search back in 2009. Source. Was using Google search in 2009 unethical?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Depends on what ur producing, running llama 3.1 locally on a raspberry pi doesnt produce any meaningful impact on the climate.