this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
145 points (100.0% liked)

World News

336 readers
326 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FistingEnthusiast 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If christians (or any religious folk) were capable of asking questions, they would not stay religious

It all falls apart under the slightest scrutiny, because it's all bullshit

Trump is a vile, reprehensible excuse for a human being. He's cruel, mendacious, narcissistic and petty

There's no need to invoke fairytales

He's just a piece of shit, and he exemplifies what is wrong with 'Murica

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Love me militant atheists pretending they're smarter than all religious people. I mean believe what you want but thinking that the universe is a coincidence doesn't make you smarter than Einstein.

[–] FistingEnthusiast 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you have a point?

You're not saying anything remotely close to a rebuttal

Religion is absurd, the very idea of an omnipotent god is a logical fallacy a la the omnipotence paradox, and it doesn't add anything to humanity

All it does is divide people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're not saying anything remotely close to a rebuttal

I did.

If christians (or any religious folk) were capable of asking questions, they would not stay religious

-You

My rebuttal is this: Most of the people who built modern civilization were religious one way or another, and the proposition that someone like, say, Isaac Newton was incapable of asking questions is frankly ridiculous. The very ideals of inquiry you're espousing now were thought up and developed by Christians.

Religion is absurd, the very idea of an omnipotent god is a logical fallacy a la the omnipotence paradox,

All it does is divide people

I mean I obviously disagree, but either way that is a completely different point than the one you made previously and I responded to.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Blasphemy was a crime in England during Newton’s time. He was literally forbidden from asking questions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you think blasphemy laws prevented Renaissance and Enlightenment Europeans from questioning Christianity then... uh... yeah.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if we banned religion and then bragged about how all the greatest people of our time are atheists, you’d be ok with that so long as a few people keep their faith anyway?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

If I then tried to imply all atheists are dumb and only enlightened religious people are smart, yes "all the greatest people of our time are atheists" would be a great rebuttal in that situation. I never said that, though, so that's a moot point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not a belief that it's a coincidence.

It's an understanding that it's a coincidence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

For values of "coincidence". It's not at all a coincidence that we live in a universe that's capable of having us live in it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hi, im an atheist who got over his militant phase and accepts people for believing what they want as long as it doesn't harm others.

You're a dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm still pretty militant about forcing others to live according to your religious beliefs though. But you can HAVE them just fine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Far as im concerned that counts under "harming others"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Should that be "not forcing others"?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

it’s not pretending

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The Bible praises intelligence and knowledge, and condemns those who reject them.

Questioning and scrutiny and deconstruction is exactly the path many grow in faith.

On the topic, trump may not be "The Antichrist", that's not even something with much biblical basis; he certainly is "an Antichrist" both in the sense of being the complete opposite of Christ, and in the sense of replacing Christ.