this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
1853 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7671 readers
1309 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Lets not pretend the presidential election is all about gender and nothing else. Thats just not true.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I could understand Hilary not getting elected, but Harris? She's as blank slate as any presidential candidate could get ( and maybe that was the problem). But the demographics which shifted the most politically, was the Hispanic and black male (whom tend to be less educated) voters towards the right. That could either be populism or misogyny, and considering they were leaning left when elected Biden the previous term, I'm leaning towards the latter reason.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She was also a candidate we didn't vote for, Biden being shoved down our throats again then him dropping out are what gave Trump the election. The focus on her gender and nothing else is to keep you from remembering that the DNC fucked us again and a large number of voters protest voting because "She'll genocide the Palestinians" like TRUMP wouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"The DNC" does not have the power to force Biden to step aside when he doesn't want to.

They aren't a military or a government. They are a club, and Biden was far and away the senior member.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The fact that when it comes to politics I see Americans nowadays keep repeating over and over and over again "this can't be done", "they don't have the power", "that will never happen", is to me astonishing. When I was growing up, America was where things HAPPENED. What happened to you guys? Where did this learned helplessness come from?

So your party structures are broken and unable to produce good outcomes? Change them. Reform them. Update them. What the fuck is wrong with you people? You made democracy into a fossil that you no longer fit in and you're despairing. It's supposed to be a living breathing thing that evolves all the time. WTF.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I have to agree, it is very weird that people treat their society like an thing set in stone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

40% of the country wants it to be worse in every way imaginable. They want more religion in the halls of power, more impressive law enforcement and mass incarceration, more dictatorial centralization of power, less education more environmental destruction more wealth concentration in fewer elites hands, less protections for workers, and their families, more poverty sickness and death.

They aren't the same people either, sixty-70% want one or some of the things on that list.

If we declared a constitutional convention, I don't think there would be any agreement whatsoever about what changes to make, and if there were, agreement, I expect they would be disasterous.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

She's a former cop and prosecutor that wasn't selected through a primary process (not that Dems ever allow anyone not selected by party elites.)

She's basically a Republican with zero progressive policies, which isn't going to appeal to an increasingly radicalized base.

There were a lot of problems with her that had nothing to do with her being a her.

Democrats keep chasing votes to the right, abandoning the actual left and the working class.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

If the Dems wanted to stop losing they could have selected Sanders. It's not about gender, it's about trust, and nobody trusted Clinton or Harris (nor should they, frankly). Meanwhile Sanders has spoken for the working class the whole time he has been around.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember how Dukakis got tanked by a goofy helmet? Yea, Harris sank when she couldn't propose any change from Biden.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

tanked

nice pun cuz iirc he was riding in one while wearing that helmet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Knowing my paisanos, it was plain old ignorance. I mean, we did elect a woman president this year. 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Kamela lost because she's a woman

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Were there other problems in Clinton and Harris than the gender, then? (Except them "lying" that Trump would use the army against US civilians, of course)

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Clinton is a fuckin capitalist and Harris is a fucking neoliberal. Neither of them actually care about anything more than upholding the status quo. They are not working class or even for the working class.

This all being said, status quo is far better than fascism, but we can do better.

Basically, just like someone being a woman wouldn't make them a bad president, it would also not make them a good one. Having good policies makes you a good president.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The status quo is a slow slide into fascism. And we are at the end of that slide. At some point, and that point was 2016, enough people would rather vote for the fascist than the woman that, at best, would continue the slow decline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good luck finding a presidential candidate with good policies in USA.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You asked what the other problems with them were, not whether there was a good presidential candidate, i was answering your question

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No unclarity regarding that, don't worry :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Were there other problems in Clinton and Harris than the gender, then?

If it was misogyny alone was the cause, then why did harris lose across every single demographic of women? She lost across every single voting demographic of general voter except a 1 point gain in college educated white men.

We have polling data, we could dig through it-- and the results must be a statistical understanding of a number of reasons. There wont be a unifying single smoking gun across this many voters and issues. We aren't that uniform of a group of people for that. Although there will be some that are larger than others, like Gaza, consumer prices, wage stagnation, and misogyny.

Dems are failing to honestly analyze why we lost, just like they failed to figure out how we could win. So we're on track to lose again, and comments like the one you made show we arent making much progress-- or that we even have any will to.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

women can be misogynistic too

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Uh... If the misogyny was enough to remove enough votes from them to allow the worse candidate to win, then obviously it was a decisive factor. Being a decisive factor does not equal being the only factor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it wasn't the decisive factor. The misogynists wouldn't have voted for Harris either way. The decisive factor was Harris failing to inspire her own base while pandering to the elusive "undecided voter" by propping up Liz Cheney, among other things. Don't get it twisted, Harris lost because she and her team were too incompetent to read the room.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

What is this the decisive factor you're talking about? You can have several.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the misogyny was enough to remove enough votes from them to allow the worse candidate to win, then obviously it was a decisive factor.

Sure, but how do we put actual numbers behind that "if"?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I posted a post-deep-dive take on what gave Trump the presidency here, but I will say that misogyny did did no small amount of heavy lifting.

What we need to figure out before the GOP finds its next cult leader is how to neutralize the massive far-right propaganda machine that is churning out false information and disinforming the public.

We've decided before that ethically we can't trust human beings to make sound decisions in some conditions. Gambling, for example. Sometimes humans get addicted to just giving the house their money when it's coached in a probability game. But then we've just invented loopholes (and lootboxes) to circumvent regulation. So I don't know how we're going to deprogram massive viewerships of media that promotes hate, including misogyny.

If we fail then the ~~ice zombie army~~ climate crisis (and running out of water for agriculture) is going to drive us to extinction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

That's not what they said.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

hmmmmm... stats say otherwise. A lot of males did not vote for her because she was female. That said, US is clearly not ready for female president.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

hmmmmm… stats say otherwise.

Can you show us the stats you're talking about?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Remind me when you get a response. ~~it won't happen.~~

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There are also a lot of liberal women who didn't vote for her because she's a woman. They didn't vote for Trump, they just didn't vote at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

A lot of males did not vote for her because she was female.

Where's the data that show this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All? No, not all. But it is very evident that most Americans seem to hate women. The right hates on women, the left hates on women, the men and the women hate on women. If you doubt me, look how news articles disparage male senators compared to female ones.

Edit: All you four people who downvote without responding only give me more validation. The people hate the truth.