this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
620 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24209 readers
4947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The “No Kings” protests in every state may have been the biggest day of demonstrations in American history, a data analyst has suggested.

“Based on hundreds of crowd-sourced records of No Kings Day event turnout, and extrapolating for the cities where we don’t have data yet, it looks like roughly 4-6m people protested Trump across the U.S. yesterday,” independent data journalist G Elliott posted to X Sunday.

For reference, that’d mean Saturday’s demonstrations featured 1-2% of the total population of 340 million taking to the streets in more than 2,000 cities to voice their opposition to the increasingly authoritarian, far-right policies the president has pursued since assuming office for the second time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

And it’s achieved nothing at all, so can shitlibs finally stop pretending that protesting does something and start campaigning for violence?

Because while you were feeling good about yourself for standing on the street, they tried to kill the two democrats they needed to flip the state to them. Only one side was going to achieve something and it only took 1 person not millions.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Silly liberals, your strategy of standing on the streets pales in comparison with my strategy of sitting at home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

you nailed it, and as you can see by the number of downvotes, we are fucked.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Think of it as a medieval army forming up. An army didn't generally march straight into battle. They took the time to organise and prepare. It also acted as an opportunity to intimidate your opponents into backing down.

The protests are the army forming up. Connections are made, wills reinforced and tied to a more focused cause. In many cases, the powers that be recognise the danger this represents and back down. When they don't, that's when things escalate.

Protests like this are a necessary part of reaching the goal. They are a link in the chain. People don't want violence. It will be accepted, if required, but not joyously.

Just remember, in a blunt head to head fight, the enemy would be the US military. You would need to either defeat them directly, or break their will. What would it take to cause large scale defections within the US army? Are people willing to pay that price?

Failing that, the slower, less drastic methods must be employed. It's a war of psychological attrition, not a fist fight.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A better use of protest time would be a general strike. Protesting does little more than slow these assholes down in traffic.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

These rallies/protests/whatever are exactly how you build momentum for a general strike.

A general strike is useless without a significant percentage of the population joining. As these protests keep happening the attendees trust that the networks that are drawing them together will step with them into more drastic action, like a general strike. We are building a small amount of trust and cooperation between literally millions of people. It's not going to happen overnight.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can show up to a protest, but I cannot afford to participate in a general strike. 🤷 I think you would see dramatically different numbers with a general strike.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You won't be able to afford anything once we start feeling the effects of the Great Depression 2. Part of the point of protests is to connect, collaborate, and support each other. Plenty of strikes involve crowdfunded support for those that need it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you want them what, starve to death now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Part of the point of protests is to connect, collaborate, and support each other. Plenty of strikes involve crowdfunded support for those that need it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah when it comes to actually sacrificing anything Americans can't be fucked.

They would rather throw away their entire country to the fascists than face any hardship.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Right? November 6th, every American leftist should have immediately started gunning down Trump voters in the streets, that would have solved everything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Implying these protestors have jobs to strike from.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Hi.

I went to the protest. I've been continuously employed for the last 15 years.

Your perception of the typical protestor could not be more wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Go be our one person, then.