Fuck AI

3358 readers

1200 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

176

Anthropic can legally train AI on books without authors permission, judge rules (cybernews.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32347293

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except that some derivative works are allowed by humans under current copyright law. This has been degraded to the point where reaction videos have some defense as a derivative work.

If a reaction video is a derivative work, why can't an AI trained on that work also count?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“Derivative” is less questionable than “work”.

For eg. AI Gen imagery is not copyrightable for the most part, legally closer to plagiarism than art?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Derivative describes what happened to the copyrighted work, not what slop was churned out by it.

If the plagiarism is far enough from the original work, it isn't protected by the original copyright.