this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1374 readers
71 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

All from in this thread in [email protected] about a chant at a British music festival where an artist said "death, death to the IDF".

After other users were quoting that chant in the comments and had comments removed and banned, the hero of our story, @[email protected] (appearing as "acargitz") pointed out that under international law, fighting an occupying force is legitimate. But apparently not under world news rules, as their removed comments and the many explanations from mods make clear in the thread.

Equally against the rules is the call for the eradication of an organisation or business, even without an explicit call to violence against individual members of the business.

In the same thread: user @[email protected] had comments removed for being anti-American "(again)", though I couldn't see the first time. It's not even clear to me how the removed comments were anti-American.

Bonus points for the "DC Comics" removal reason. Though this seems to be incompetence, rather than malice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So who is it okay to call for violence against, and eho is it not? You'd get less hate if you clarified.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (27 children)

For this person (who ironically mods [email protected]), I think the answer is black & white; it’s childishly simple. Violence is strictly reserved for the state, because the state has a monopoly on violence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Okay, so 'i am a cop and i swear to kill you' or 'i hope the police murder you' or 'i, police commisioner in your town, will not rest until you and your family are dead' are fine

But 'i hope that cop stubs its toe' or 'if a cop shoots me, im shooting back, besides, how would i even know?' Would be bannable?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, you can’t wish for violence, but the state can, and it can carry out the violence. You can only tut-tut about state violence and vote blue no matter who (unless they’re a socialist like Zohran Mamdani).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol you're understanding radicalism vs status quo now babaay

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

don't you mean western states? russia doesn't have a monopoly on violence, there it's the windows that kill people.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's never OK to call for violence, not in our Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not in our lemmy lol. Lemmy as a aplatform do not belong to anybody

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (39 children)

If there was an armed thug murdering defenseless children on a street, and there was someone calling to kill the thug to stop children being murdered, would you ban the person calling to defend the children?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

See the Francine Hughes case re: self defense and how it is completely legally defensible to light your abusive husband on fire while he sleeps, per US law. Self defense isn't generally considered violence and isn't generally labeled as violence either.

So why can we only talk about the violence committed by corporations and billionaires, and not talk about self defense?

Ofc, there are many ways to resist nonviolently, here is a free book about it: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501756061/pranksters-vs-autocrats/#bookTabs=1

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If there was an armed thug murdering defenseless children on a street, and there was someone calling to kill the thug to stop children being murdered, would you ban the person calling to defend the children?

The thug is old and senile so that makes it ok.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Except when violence is the default, against someone you dont consider a person.

Then you can call for it to continue, and only asking for it to stop is violent.