this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
911 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62732 readers
268 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Are you suggesting that all art should be free?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Eventually, yes. If everyone's needs are provided for, there is no requirement anymore to extract value from art, one can just make it and share it freely.

Copyright should be abolished.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Especially if the creator(s) is deceased.

Are you suggesting only the wealthy are deserving of art?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Only the wealthy can afford art? Music? Movies? Graphic Novels? Video Games?

Are you being obtuse?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Capitalism is at the heart of your question. Art should be valued. Artists should be paid. Neither of those things requires capitalism or copyright laws. If as a society we funded artists properly none of this would an issue. The line that copyright is good for artists is total bullshit. It's a smokescreen that corporations use to prop up the system they created and benefit the most from.