this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
1276 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6707 readers
650 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

(I don't think that was your teachers point at all, but) couldn't the different formulas have produced different rounding errors due to floating point percision?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Excel has a 15 point float, a quadrillionth, which should be enough for anything you were using excel for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

yeah because excel does rounding stuff automatically for you

try entering 0.1 + 0.2 - 0.1 - 0.2 == 0.0 in any programming language of your choice and see what happens.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doubtful, but if anything mine would be more accurate. Fewer calculation steps to lose precision on. I think most spreadsheet software fudges floating point precision anyway. A computer programmer may accept that 0.1+0.2 is not 0.3 but an accountant or mathematician would not be having it.

I think she was just shit at maths tbh. As a kid you sort of assume all the teachers know more than you about every subject, and that's not the case at all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

As a kid you sort of assume all the teachers know more than you about every subject, and that’s not the case at all.

same for chatgpt