this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10115 readers
405 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They believe they have a God given right to break the speed limit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So let's push for that instead of pushing to remove cameras. In fact, proportional fines would probably increase the revenue, which would bring the funds to improve the road design so folks don't get the wrong impression of the speed they're supposed to be in. Also let's push for better transit so poor people are not forced to drive and risk getting fined.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I'm down for eating the billionaires, this sounds awfully close to punishing people for being successful.

I agree it disproportionally affects poor people, but rather than scaling the punishment, maybe the answer is to look for non punitive measures that produce the same result.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm in agreement that we need systemic solutions, and those involve improving road design, so we agree for the most part on the most important aspect of this.

punishing people for being successful.

But issuing bigger fines for breaking the law is very, VERY far from punishing people for being successful. It's a correction of an unfortunate truth: if you're wealthy, you can afford to drive recklessly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Unscaled fines punish people for being poor, because the punishment is a larger percentage of their disposable income.

Why should a poor person pay a fine of 30% of their monthly take home, while a rich enough person pays 5% (or less?) of their take home for the same infraction.

The only fair solution is for the fine to amount to an equal percent of your take home pay. Then it is the same punishment for everyone.