this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
1190 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35972 readers
668 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (5 children)

USB-C will be around for a long time, it's a strong standard. Wireless inductive charging won't take over for a long time because it's limited in speed, and WiFi/Bluetooth are much slower for data transfer.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

USB-C is just the connector type, not a particular speed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

True, I appreciate the correction, the actual data transfer speed is determined by the USB version.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will never forgive USB for the ridiculous naming

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Agree, it's a total trainwreck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Uuuhhhhh, copilot, is that you?!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

480mbps is still faster than shitty cloud services

edit: yes I know about usb 1.0 and 1.1

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

USB 1.0 barely got any traction. I have never seen a device in the wild.

USB 1.1 exploded in use and was fantastic compared to the mess before. It was fast enough for most file sizes at the time.

USB 2.0 is still very usable today.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Is there any actual benefit for wireless charging? You still need to plug the charger somewhere and just feels like more expensive way that's prone to more problems.

I am all for "research for the sake of research is enough and needs no further justification." But I still feel like I am missing something here. Why are companies producing and selling it? Am I dumb?

Only scenario it seems useful is that you can replace your phone's USB hardware with a small badUSB and rely on wireless charger while cops wonder why they can't investigate your files on their device.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

I've had several phone where the USB socket stops working reliably. At that point it's easier to use a wireless charger.

Yes, it's usually pocket fluff in the socket and it can be picked out, but it takes some time and care to avoid damaging the socket.

My latest case (Otter) also has a cover that is awkward to open to plug in the lead, so there's that too.

As a bonus the charger works with Apple and Android so very convenient as my kids are Macolytes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I guess from a consumer perspective, it can be more convenient (e.g. wireless charging in a car)

For me, I see it as a way to reduce wear on a charging port, or as an alternative if the port does fail.

I like it for the latter as I don't like my devices to be inefficient but it makes me feel better that should the USB-C fail on my phone, it's not game over for my phone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Wireless charging is nice for when you're using your phone infrequently, such as at your desk while you're working on something else. It sits there charging, you grab it to respond to a message then set it back down. No tail to worry about, it's not getting tangled on other wires when you dare to move your phone, etc.

It's really a feature I never cared about until I got a wireless charger as a gift

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Convenience. Decor. It’s much easier to slap a phone on a charger. The chargers also look better than a cable laying around unplugged.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have these battery packs that magnetically stick to the back of my phone and charge it. Just slap it on and forget about it.

It makes my phone hot and wastes a lot of power (I can also charge from the same battery packs using a cable, and I get noticeably more charge).

But it’s real convenient when you don’t want to worry about it. I use them at conventions or when I’m out hiking or skiing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same. In winter it doubles as a pocket heater. Summer is worse, I wish electronics could also feasibly convert waste heat to cooling, but physics be like “yea, nah”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

There are fans that attach to the backs of phones. Of course they use electricity as well.

Clipping a sterling engine and a radiator to the back of a phone could be fun.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It also is less energy efficient as running the juice directly through a cable of course is more efficient than creating a magnetic field that then induces juice on the other side to flow again.

It should be said that this is the principle of transformers, but they are built in an efficient way for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Transformer without a core (which makes them about 90% efficient, while wireless at 70%, if perfectly aligned, rest is heat).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

There's the regular wireless charging where you need to put the phone on exactly the right position. That one is totally useless, since it's even less flexible than cable charging. The only upside is that you don't need to physically insert the cable. That's pretty much worthless.

There's another setup that allows you to charge over a larger area, e.g. a whole desk. That is expensive and/or much work, since it needs to be integrated into the whole area (e.g. desk) and it's incredibly wasteful in terms of energy consumption that doesn't actually end up charging the phone.

The only real upside I can see of wireless charging is that you can use it if your USB C port is worn out and doesn't work any more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk about the wifi thing, my phone should technically be able to do >500 Mbps to my computer yet it still transfers files at like 10 over wifi or usb

500 would be more than good enough but 10 is not

(It's a OnePlus 12, age is not the issue)

I would also dislike the loss but I don't think data speed is really the issue. Mostly that I couldn't connect peripherals like my flash drive or sd card anymore

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

take manufacturer's claims

divide by 10

half it

half it again

you now have the max your device will ever reach, with the usual speeds being ~60% of that

(my isp says 300mbps, divide by 10, half, half, 7,5mbps, which i think i never saw since the speeds are actually from 3 to 4)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I can get like 300 Mbps on a speed test tho

That's probably a problem with your router or receiving hardware btw unless you've confirmed otherwise

Especially if you're in an area with a lot of other wifi signals or radio frequency interference

If it's an ISP provided router you could probably ask for them to look at it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's probably a problem with your router

isp provided router

receiving hardware

tried multiple devices, both wireless and wired, even with an name brand external wireless antenna

Especially if you're in an area with a lot of other wifi signals or radio frequency interference

Middle of nowhere countryside.

If it's an ISP provided router you could probably ask for them to look at it

Tried, they gave me the Deny, defend, depose treatment

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I would say to first try the speed on ethernet. If that's slow, then it's the service or the modem and not the router. I think even the worst router you can find would support at least 250 Mbps on Ethernet.

To see if it's the router's fault, you could try some high bandwidth local network transfer, with sftp or something. If that's slow, if you have the money you can just buy one of those fancy gaming routers or some other highly reviewed one.

If there's a few walls or floors in between you and the router that could be the problem and a fancier higher power router will help with that. Another thing that could help is installing another access point near where you're device is, although that's obviously a lot of effort.

If even ethernet is slow and they refuse to help you then if you're in the US or Canada you can try submitting a complaint on the Better Business Bureau website. This actually helped us once or twice when dealing with some cellular problems. You wouldn't think it would do anything but I guess sometimes it gets them to pay at least a little bit of attention to the problem.

I have heard about how bad and monopolistic rural Internet can be, good luck

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wifi is generally faster though, at least from phones. They often have horrible data transfer with MTP, and use USB2.0, so maybe 20-30MB/s real-world. Wifi is much faster, I usually get double that or more on my phone. Way more fun to transfer videos etc, and you don't need to plug it to another device to push something to network storage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How one would cut and paste videos from an android to a pc?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

KDE Connect, when set up properly(pretty much does it automatically) alongside a linux system, you can access the entirety of your phone's internal storage over LAN as if it were a network drive mounted on your PC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Kde connect was also pretty slow for me, but not any slower than MTP

I was using the Windows version tho

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Should we tell them about usb d?