88
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

California is facing the WORST housing crisis in the United States

Visible homelessness is out of control.

One of the reason California is in this mess? Most cities use zoning to require single family homes. Multi-story housing is significantly cheaper to build than single family homes. Yet most California cities ban multifamily housing.

Take for instance Los Angeles. The pink area is single-family homes ONLY:

That's right. The second biggest US city doesn't allow multi-story housing in a majority of its land.

Texas is run by a bunch of religious weirdos. Yet they don't have a housing crisis. You know why? Because these religious weirdos are building housing at over twice the rate of California:

In 2020, a California state senator named Senator Scott Wiener introduced a bill to change zoning rules

His bill would have automatically allowed multi-story housing near train stations, metro stations, bus lines and schools. This is not a radical proposal. This is common sense.

California politicians killed the bill.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/business/economy/sb50-california-housing.html

Today, he is trying again.

Bill SB-79 will make it legal to build more multi-family housing near rail stations and rapid bus lines, including in areas where such homes are currently illegal.

https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260sb79

Housing experts support the bill 🏘️

Transit agencies support the bill 🚍

Amtrak supports the bill 🚆

Yet some angry homeowners are now calling their politicians, urging them to kill this bill again 🤦

https://www.kqed.org/news/12042670/controversial-housing-near-transit-bill-advances-to-next-stop-in-legislature

Take for instance columnist Steve Williams:

https://redstate.com/steve-williams/2025/07/21/sb-79-sacramentos-plot-to-shove-high-rises-into-your-neighborhood-and-shut-you-up-about-it-n2191881

Recently, powerful Senator Josh Becker - who represents Menlo Park, Mountain View and Palo Alto - said he changed his mind. His constituents want to kill affordable housing:

https://www.paloaltoonline.com/housing/2025/06/11/despite-advancing-fate-of-housing-bill-sb-79-remains-uncertain/

Why is LA spending money to build metro stations in the middle of fucking nowhere 🤨?!

More housing near transit is a great idea.

If bill SB-79 is killed, this will be a huge defeat from the transit system and affordable housing.

https://calmatters.org/housing/2025/04/committee-chairs-housing-policy/

There is a fucking housing WAR happening right now. If you don't fight this war, young people, renters, transit users, and new home buyers will lose.

Please call your representatives. Tell them to support Bill-S79:

https://www.assembly.ca.gov/assemblymembers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

If such a law came into effect, you would remove all rental properties from the market overnight. Don’t you think that would lead to catastrophic homelessness? There must be a mechanism for people and companies to buy and offer rental accommodation. A LOT of people can’t afford to buy a house.

I think the solution is clear: the business case for rental property should be made worse. A comprehensive land value tax without exemption has been championed by notable economists for more than a century. It’s as close to a perfect tax as it gets. It aligns public and private interests, which are currently opposed. Owners are encouraged to use the space efficiently, so they build up and lobby for laws which make it easier for them to build. With less demand for land, prices drop, and land prices are tightly correlated with rental rates.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Thanks. I’m obviously not a lawmaker. I think older rentals (30+ yrs) should revert to public ownership - the profit has been made and all the rent needs to be reinvested to keep or replace the structure.

Anyway the idea is corporate and foreign ownership is the problem. I don’t think tax is enough - that may just raise rents even more. There needs to be actual blocks from ownership - not an open bid process. Otherwise the rich will out bid us every time - in rent and in ownership.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

The reason that governments don't seize assets is because it makes the country (or state) uninvestable. See what happened to Zimbabwe. Seizing assets always leads to very bad social outcomes across the board. It's much less destructive to tax things we want to happen less. A high tax on land ownership would reduce land ownership (and demand, and therefore price).

Some countries use some combination of only permitting residents to purchase certain types of property. Denmark, for example, requires non-EU non-citizens ask for permission to purchase property. Of course this then requires very strict immigration controls. If those aren't in place, then anyone can walk into the country and buy whatever they like, and the policy is meaningless.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

California

1861 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS