this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
134 points (92.4% liked)

United Kingdom

12 readers
1 users here now

Main community for the Feddit UK instance

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedegenerate -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think I answered that. Or I don't understand your question. Just keep banning what?

I suppose I assumed the aim of the policy is "to stop fatal dog attacks in the UK". I also assumed that was the reasoning behind the pitbull ban too, and look where we are. We could learn from history, or we could just keep banning them. This is all just repetition of my previous comment though.

I guess if the aim is to ban breeds of dogs then sure, why not keep banning them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and look where we are

Um, a bit safer with fewer mental dogs running about

[–] Fedegenerate -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This would go a lot easier if you would please read my initial comment. Both of your comments are answered in there.

[Edit, both comments aren't you, my bad. So far everything asked is addressed in my initial comment though] there also aren't fewer dog attacks now than compared to before the pitbull ban.