this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
750 points (100.0% liked)

News

28904 readers
4201 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 109 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Way to kill the goodwill you've been gaining Taylor

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only half the country is inundated and riled up to see her as an Enemy of the State and an Enemy of the people. There must be many thousands now who want to see her raped, tortured and killed. She's been vilified. And she's not really a political figure unlike Musk who controls a significant part of the worlds communication medium and is politically active.

Taylor Swift has enough money to protect herself, but imagine someone less wealthy would be similarly tracked and/or vilified.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody should own a private jet. If you have one, it gets tracked.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nobody should own a car. If you have one, you get put on a list and hunted down! :D

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Nobody should be forced to need a car.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Ironically based

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

False equivalence.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

someone less wealthy would be similarly tracked

I'm sympathetic to the perspective, but actually no, someone less wealthy couldn't be similarly tracked. To be tracked in this specific way, you must have exclusive ownership of plane(s) with tail numbers.

If you fly commercial and don't publish your itenirary publicly, then the public won't know your association with the flight. If you charter a private flight, then again no one knows that chartered plane == you. You have to actually own a dedicated private plane for anyone to use these resources to confidently track you in particular.

So I'm broadly sympathetic to the plight of celebrities with respect to paparazzi and stalkers and such. But with the availability of charter flights, hard for me to be too sympathetic of someone afflicted by private plane tracking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just a small clarification: the GOP does not have half of the country. Not even half of the voting population.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ehh, she is still human. She is one of the most recognizable and sought after a celebrities we've seen in a very long time. It must be absolutely horrible to be 24/7 in the public eye. But you can't fight it and she hasn't learned that yet. Try not to blame her, just be glad we got a level of goodwill that you don't find in most celebrities, and hope that it continues.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

??? Don't fly in a private jet then

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

You don't even need to fly commercial to avoid being tracked in this way. If you charter planes then the tracking strategy falls apart too.

Owning your own plane means that anyone who cares gets to know your rough goings on. For example, we get to hear Harrison Ford get in trouble for accidentally landing on a taxiway in his plane (he was quite reasonable about it)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

No one is forcing her to fly around that much. And she's by no means a new up and coming celebrity but has been dealing with this since 2 decades now.

So no, she doesn't get a free pass to use her wealth to silence very deserved criticism of her disgusting global footprint! Heck, she could spend a tiny amount of her dragon hoard sized wealth to donate to environmental protection to offset this footprint. But no, she rather uses that money to sue someone who she knows doesn't have the wealth to fight her legally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel you. Makes sense to me.

I wonder why someone hasn't started a Part 135 for celebrities that way they can't be tracked per se. Rent out planes instead of being owned by any one celebrity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You can totally charter private jets bud.