this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
1031 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7716 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s up to the voters to make an informed fucking choice. That’s the point of citizenship. Voting isn’t a fucking popularity contest, it’s a civic duty.

Exactly. So don't put the blame on the voters if the DNC can't put up a candidate the voters actually want to vote for. It's the voters job to pick who they want to vote for, it's not the voters job to vote for whomever the DNC tells them to vote for. You have the burden of responsibility backward.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So don’t put the blame on the voters if the DNC can’t put up a candidate the voters actually want to vote for. It’s the voters job to pick who they want to vote for, it’s not the voters job to vote for whomever the DNC tells them to vote for. You have the burden of responsibility backward.

So let me get this straight: it's the DNC's responsibility to make sure that the winner of the primary DOESN'T get the nomination, because the voters don't want him, despite having voted for him?

Believe it or not, most people aren't interested in another candidate. "Generic Democrat Who I Can Project All My Views On" outperforms Biden, but no one who is actually running does.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DNC actively subverted the primary process this year, so no, the results of this election are 100% on Biden (and his unappealing candidacy).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, remember when NH made sure Biden was the only guy on the ballot, and he still lost?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

No, actually I remember Biden fumbling right out of the gate by not even doing the minimum to register in NH.

I also remember his admin working with the DNC to contact state committees asking them to cancel primaries outright, which several did. Very cool, very democratic.

For that matter, Biden also seemed content to nap in his bunker instead of engage with other primary candidates to promote his ideas. He seems to be leaning quite heavily on the strategy of “not trump” will be enough for him. Pretty irrespinsible if you ask me, considering his claims of democracy being on the line. Why can’t Biden make his case?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So let me get this straight: it’s the DNC’s responsibility to make sure that the winner of the primary DOESN’T get the nomination, because the voters don’t want him, despite having voted for him?

It's the DNC's responsibility to put pressure on the candidate that wasn't sure if they were going to run to not run because the polls showed him getting beat. It's also their responsibility to not change the primaries to heavily favor one candidate like making South Carolina (the place where Biden's luck in 2019 changed) the first official primary.

but no one who is actually running does.

And that is also the DNC's problem. They didn't put forth a viable candidate in the primaries despite all the polling suggesting they should.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s the DNS’s responsibility to put pressure on the candidate that wasn’t sure if they were going to run to not run because the polls showed him getting beat.

So now it is the DNC's responsibility to put pressure on the scales to change the candidate....

It’s also their responsibility to not change the primaries to heavily favor one candidate like making South Carolina (the place where Biden’s luck in 2019 changed) the first official primary.

... except when it's not? Very coherent, 10/10 worldview.

And that is also the DNC’s problem. They didn’t put forth a viable candidate in the primaries despite all the polling suggesting they should.

"They didn't put forth"

Tell me you don't understand primaries without telling me you don't understand primaries. Not to mention that explicitly contradicts your previous point about not wanting the DNC to pick the candidates. Jesus fucking Christ. We're done here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here let me point out the parts you seemed to have missed:

not run because the polls showed him getting beat.

not change the primaries to heavily favor one candidate

despite all the polling suggesting they should

The polls showed they shouldn't favor the candidate they did. They chose against what was obvious instead of encouraging others to run they picked their favored candidate before it even started.

“They didn’t put forth”

You're right, the wording there isn't correct. It should be that they didn't encourage others to run.

We’re done here.

Unfortunately it appears the voters are thinking the same thing. That's why it's the party's responsibility field the best candidate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking Christ. We're done here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's what I would expect from someone who expects voters to toe the line for the party instead of blaming the party for a bad candidate. Do as you say or be ignored right?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If the voters are too stupid to vote against Trump by voting for Biden, that is on them.

Biden hasn't done anything to screw over US citizens. Yes, he continues some shitty foreign policies by supporting Israel and hasn't achieved as much as he wanted because of GOP obstruction, but he has done some positive stuff.

Trump never did anything positive at all, and tried to overthrow the government.

Real tough choice there!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But maybe if fascism wins this time, we'll magically get a left-wing government afterwards? It's like a pendulum!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"First Hitler then Our Turn"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the voters are too stupid to vote against Trump by voting for Biden, that is on them.

Nope. That's on the candidate.

Real tough choice there!

I mean, I agree with you. It's an obvious choice and I can't put my mind in the headspace of anyone that can vote for Trump at this point. Usually I can at least understand the opposition's point of view. I will definitely be voting for Biden... However, that doesn't change the fact that it is up to the party and the candidate to earn the votes, it's not up to the voters to cover for the party.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Biden appeals to most of the Democratic voters, which is why he is their candidate and why he won in 2020.

Unaffiliated voters expecting him to appeal to them specifically is on those voters, not the Dems.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unaffiliated voters expecting him to appeal to them specifically is on those voters, not the Dems.

Except if the Democrats want to win.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So don't appeal to the Dem party voters, appeal to other people who have an extremely wide variety of expectations that apparently don't align with the Dems.

Sound logic!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to win, you have to appeal to the majority of voters. That's how voting works... You can do that by energizing the base to overcome the middle or by appealing to the middle. If you pick a candidate that can't do either, don't expect to win.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I don't like candidates like Biden that don't stand for anything, they just try to appeal to everyone and are too bland."

-the middle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice strawman you have there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In that case, nice anecdote you have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s like people didn’t notice how the GOP shrank down to core fanatics and dems won by expanding the tent in their own party.

Now these people think the same level of ideological compromise that should define congress apparently has no place in their own party.

NEWSFLASH: if you refuse to participate unless your ideological purity test is met, you should prob go join the tea party.

Get over it and grow up. A capable, national political party will clearly include people other than you, viewpoints other than yours, and you won’t always get what you want.

Work with people instead of working selfishly against everyone not 100% aligned with your own mental utopia. Your purity test is not a reason to flip the table.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. That’s on the candidate.

Anything but citizens accepting responsibility for their actions in a democracy. ANYTHING but that!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is nothing saying a voter has to vote or that a candidate has to run. We both voluntarily take part in this transaction and it's up to the candidate to earn the votes of the voters.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is nothing saying a voter has to vote

No, there isn't.

But a voter not voting is still making a choice, and they are responsible for that choice.

The candidates aren't lords, and we aren't peasants. In a republic, CITIZENS are responsible for who they vote OR DON'T VOTE for.

There's no choice you can make where you lack responsibility. Whatever happens - it is our fault as citizens. If you can answer to your conscience in the case of a Trump presidency... well, gods help you, because I can't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, it was the voters choice to say that neither of the candidates appealed to them. It's not the voters fault if a candidate loses, it's the candidates fault for not appealing to the voters. It's really not a complicated concept, but you're still getting it backward.

If a company goes out of business is it the fault of the consumer, or of the company for not offering products the consumer wants?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Do the customers know that going out of business means it will be replaced with a new fascist business which will absolutely destroy the town?

If so, that is on the customers for letting perfection be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it was the voters choice to say that neither of the candidates appealed to them.

In which case that voter is responsible for whichever one that won.

Refusing to act just means that you have endorsed the end result.

It’s not the voters fault if a candidate loses, it’s the candidates fault for not appealing to the voters.

It's the voters fault that whoever wins, wins. You don't get to cross your arms and get all huffy and say "Well, I wasn't going to vote for GENOCIDE JOE, but I don't like that Trump won! This is unfair!"

Your. Vote. Matters.

Citizens. Have. Responsibility.

If a company goes out of business is it the fault of the consumer, or of the company for not offering products the consumer wants?

I can't believe I have to say this in the context of a left-leaning discussion, but companies are not democratic societies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s the voters fault that whoever wins, wins.

Hey, you got that part right. It is up the voters to pick the winner. Which is why it's up to the party to pick a candidate that can earn the votes to win.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is why it’s up to the party to pick a candidate that can earn the votes to win.

Here I thought it was up to the voters to pick a candidate. Silly me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is up to the voters... Hence the choice of the word "party" there and not DNC. The party includes the DNC and their members (their primary voters). Silly you indeed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, so your argument, then, is that Democratic voters are wrong for picking Joe Biden, not the DNC. Right? It's their fault.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If a party chooses a candidate that loses, yes it is the parties fault. Its the DNC that put their thumb on the scale and not encouraging others to run against Biden and it's their voters fault for not picking someone else.

Ultimate if Biden loses you can blame the voters and keep putting up candidates the voters don't want, or the party can decide to adapt to what the majority of voters want. In a winner takes all, FPTP voting system it's really that simple.